Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Critical Policy Studies Transnational discourse coalitions and monetary policy: Argentina and the limited powers of the ''Washington Consensus''

Abstract

Why, in the era of neoliberalism, Argentinean monetary policymakers rejected the kind of flexible monetary exchange rates recommended by the 'Washington Consensus' remains a puzzle. The literature has mainly contrasted external and internal factors of influence and constraints to explain the country's peculiar road to neoliberalism. In this paper, discourse coalition theory is developed further to more fully capture the transnational configuration of the transnational discourse coalition behind the policy mix chosen under President Menem. In the course of deconstructing the Washington Consensus alliance and reconstructing the particular agents and agencies behind the currency board, apparently contradictory positions turn out to constitute a specific combination of neoliberal agents and agencies that are firmly embedded in the larger universe of the hegemonic discourse coalition of the Washington Consensus era, which has to be considered more heterogeneous than has been recognized by most observers.

Key takeaways

  • Argentina was the only country in Latin America that introduced a currency board.
  • In order to dive deeper into the transnational dimensions of the domestic history of Argentine neoliberalism in general, and to explain more precisely how Argentina came to rely on a currency board in particular, a discourse coalition approach introduced to advance policy studies will be discussed next (section two).
  • If Cavallo and friends came to share key elements of the neoliberal discourse coalition, early Cordoba neoliberalism entailed a strong element of regional developmentalism, which is crucial to understand Argentina's somewhat uneasy neoliberal discourse coalition of the late 1970s.
  • Ramirez in this case fails to recognize the specific transnational discourse coalition behind the currency board.
  • The neoliberal discourse coalition has certainly transformed both policies and politics in Argentina.
This document is currently being converted. Please check back in a few minutes.

References (68)

  1. Ayau, M., 1990. The war of ideas in Guatemala. In: J.C. Goodman and R. Marotz-Baden, eds. Fighting the war of ideas in Latin America. Dallas: National Center for Policy Analysis, 138-146.
  2. Ayau, M., 1992. Universidad Francisco Marroquin. Guatemala. Debate. My remembrances and com- ments on the founding of Universidad Francisco Marroquin and its antecedents. Available from: http://www.ufm.edu.gt/debate/memindex.htm [Accessed July 2007].
  3. Babb, S., 2005. Neoliberalism and the rise of the new money doctors. In: G. Epstein, ed. Financialization and the world economy. New York: Edward Elgar, 243-259.
  4. Bair, J., 2009. Taking aim at the new international economic order. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 347-385.
  5. Becker, J., Jäger, J., and Musacchio, A., 2002. Finanzsystem und Krise in Argentinien und Chile. Kurswechsel, 3, 32-44.
  6. Béland, D. and Cox, R.H., 2011. Introduction: ideas and politics. In: D. Béland and R.H. Cox, eds. Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-20.
  7. Beltrán, G., 2006. The discreet charm of neoliberalism. The Argentine businesses' support to the 1990s structural reforms. Paper given LASA2006 (Latin America Studies Association), Puerto Rico. Benegas Lynch, Jr., A., 1990. The war of ideas in Argentina. In: J.C. Goodman and R. Marotz-Baden, eds. Fighting the war of ideas in Latin America. Dallas: National Center for Policy Analysis, 121-128.
  8. Bieling, H.-J., 2005. Finanzmarktintegration und transnationale Interessengruppen in der Europäischen Union. In: R. Eising and B. Kohler-Koch, eds. Interessenpolitik in Europa. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 179-201.
  9. Birle, P., 1995. Argentinien: Unternehmer, Staat und Demokratie. Frankfurt: Vervuert Verlag.
  10. Boris, D. and Tittor, A., 2006. Der Fall Argentinien: Krise, soziale Bewegungen und Alternativen. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.
  11. Botzem, S. and Plehwe, D., 2009. Transformation globaler Machtstrukturen: Private Organisationen als Akteure grenzüberschreitender Ordnungsbildung. In: K. Dingwerth, D. Kerwer, and A. Nölke, eds. Die organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 263-289.
  12. Boyer, R. and Hollingsworth, J.R., 1997. From national embeddedness to spatial and institu- tional nestedness. In: J.R. Hollingsworth and R. Boyer, eds. Contemporary capitalism: the embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433-484.
  13. Bührmann, A.D. and Schneider, W., 2008. Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv. Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse. Bielefeld, transcript.
  14. Camou, A., 2010. Knowledge behind the throne. Expert intellectuals, think tanks and economic policies in Argentina: between the 'Plan Austral and the Convertibility Crisis'. In: A. Garcé and G. Uña, eds. Think tanks and public policies in Latin America. Buenes Aires: Fundación Siena and CIPPEC, 209-235.
  15. Campbell, J.L. and Pedersen, O.K., eds., 2001. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  16. Chafuen, A., n.d. How I became a liberal. Available from: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/ chafuen1.html [Accessed 20 June 2010].
  17. Corrales, J., 1997. Why Argentines followed Cavallo: a technopol between democracy and economic reform. In: J.I. Dominguez, ed. Technopols: freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 49-94.
  18. Deppe, F., 2003. Politisches Denken zwischen den Weltkriegen, Bd. II. Hamburg: VSA Verlag. Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.G., 2002. The internationalization of palace wars. Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  19. Dominguez, J.I., ed., 1997. Technopols: freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  20. Echegaray, F., 2003. Understanding support for free-market policies in Argentina. International journal of public opinion research, 5 (4), 369-375.
  21. Elster, J., 1984. Ulysses and the sirens: studies in rationality and irrationality. Paris: Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme.
  22. Fischer, F., 1993. Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 21-42.
  23. Fischer, F., 2003. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
  24. Fischer, K., 2010. The influence of neoliberals in Chile before, during and after the Pinochet. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 305-346.
  25. Friedman, M. and Friedman, R.D., 1999. Two lucky people. Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  26. Goodman, J.C. and Marotz-Baden, R., eds., 1990. Fighting the war of ideas in Latin America. Dallas: National Center for Policy Analysis.
  27. Greenwood, J., 2009. Sir Alan Walters' role in the revival of currency boards. Economic affairs, 29 (2), 67-68.
  28. Hajer, M.A., 1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forrester, eds. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 43-76.
  29. Hanke, S.H., 2002. On dollarization and currency boards: error and deception. Policy reform, 5 (4), 203-222.
  30. Hanke, S.H. and Schuler, K. (Preface by José María Ibarbia), 1991. Banco Central o Caja de Conversion? Buenos Aires: Fundacion Republica.
  31. Hanke, S.H. and Schuler, K., 1999. A dollarization blueprint for Argentina. Foreign policy briefing, no. 52, 25.
  32. Hardy, C. and Leiba-O'Sullivan, S., 1998. The power behind empowerment: implications for research and practice. Human relations, 51 (4), 451-482.
  33. Hornberger, J.G., 1994. Classical liberalism in Argentina: a lesson for the world. Available from: http://www.fff.org/freedom/0794a.asp [Accessed 3 January 2010].
  34. Jessop, R., and Oosterlynck, S., 2008. Cultural political economy: on making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology. Geoforum, 39 (3), 1155-1169.
  35. Kellermann, C., 2006. Die Organisation des Washington Consensus. Der Internationale W ährungsfonds und seine Rolle in der internationalen Finanzarchitektur. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
  36. Link, J., 2005. Warum Diskurse nicht von personalen Subjekten 'ausgehandelt' werden. Von der Diskurs-zur Interdiskurstheorie. In: R. Keller, et al., eds. Die diskursive Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Konstanz: UVK, 77-100.
  37. Lukes, S., 1974. Power. A radical view. London: McMillan.
  38. Meltzer, A.H., 1990. Comment on 'what Washington means by policy reform'. In: J. Williamson, ed. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 29-32.
  39. Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D., eds. 2009. The road from serfdom. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  40. N'Haux, E.M., 1993. Menem-Cavallo: El Poder Mediterráneo. Argentina: Ediciones Corregidor.
  41. O'Connell, A., 2005. The recent crisis -and recovery -of the Argentine economy: some elements and background. In: G.A. Epstein, ed. Financialization and the world economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 289-313.
  42. Pablo, J.C. de, 1990. The three major debtors -Argentina. In: J. Williamson, ed. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 111-128.
  43. Peet, R., 2003. Unholy trinity. The IMF, World Bank and WTO. London: Zed Books.
  44. Phillips-Fein, K., 2009. Business conservatives and the Mont Pèlerin society. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from serfdom. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 280-304.
  45. Plehwe, D., 2009. The origins of the neoliberal economic development discourse. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from serfdom. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 238-279.
  46. Plehwe, D., 2010. The making of a comprehensive transnational discourse community. In: M.-L. Djelic and S. Quack, eds. Transnational communities. Shaping global economic governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305-326.
  47. Plehwe, D. and Walpen, B., 2006. Between network and complex organization: the making of neolib- eral knowledge and hegemony. In: D. Plehwe, B. Walpen and G. Neunhöffer, eds. Neoliberal hegemony: a global critique. London: Routledge (RIPE Series), 27-50.
  48. Plehwe, D., Walpen, B., and Neunhöffer, G, eds., 2006. Neoliberal hegemony: a global critique. London: Routledge (RIPE Series).
  49. Ptak, R., 2009. Neoliberalism in Germany: revisiting the ordoliberal foundations of the social mar- ket economy. In: P. Mirowski and D. Plehwe, eds. The road from serfdom. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 89-138.
  50. Ramirez, H., 2000. La Fudnación Mediterránea y de cómo construir poder. La génesis de un proyecto hegemonónico. Cordoba: ferreyra Editor.
  51. Ramirez, H., 2007. Corporaciones en el Poder: Institutos económicos y acción politica en Brasil y Argentina: IPES, FIEL y Fudnación Mediterránea. San Isidro: Lenguaje claro editora.
  52. Ramirez, H., 2010. Genealogias del consenso: Brasil y Argentina, 1961-1991. A Contra corriente. Una revista de historia social y literatura de America Latina, 7 (3), 185-218.
  53. Roig, A., 2007. Discurso y moneda en la creación de la convertibilidad' en Papeles de Trabajo, revista virtual del IDAES/Universidad Nacional de San Martín, año 1, número 1, Available from: http://www.idaes.edu.ar/papelesdetrabajo/paginas/Documentos/ROIG.pdf, último acceso: 27-04-07 ISSN 1851-2577 [Accessed 3 July 2010].
  54. Santoro, D., 1994. El Hacedor. Una biografia politica de Domingo Cavallo. Buenos Aires: Planeta.
  55. Schmelzer, M., 2010. Freiheit für Wechselkurse und Kapital! Die Ursprünge neoliberaler Währungspolitik und die Mont Pelerin Society. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.
  56. Schmidt, V.A., 2002. The futures of European capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  57. Schuler, K., n.d. About me. Available from: http://users.erols.com/kurrency/aboutme.htm [Accessed 27 September 2010].
  58. Schvarzer, J., 1986. La politica económica de Martinez de Hoz. Buenos Aires: Editorial Hyspamérica.
  59. Schwartz, A.J., 1992. Do currency boards have a future? Occasional Paper No. 88. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  60. Schwartz, A.J., 1993. Currency boards: their past, present, and possible future role. Carnegie- Rochester Series on Public Policy, 39, December, 147-188.
  61. Simmons, B.A., Dobbin, F., and Garrett, G., 2008. Introduction: the diffusion of liberalization. In: B.A. Simmons, F. Dobbin and G. Garrett, eds. The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-63.
  62. Viguera, A., 2000. La trama politica de la aperture económica en la Argentina (1987-1996). La Plata: Colección Universitaria.
  63. Wagner, P., 1986. Social sciences and political projects. The emergence and demise of reform coali- tions between social scientists and policy-makers in France, Italy and West Germany. WZB Discussion Paper P 86-6. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
  64. Wagner, P. and Wittrock, B., 1991. States, institutions, and discourses: a comparative perspective on the structuration of the social sciences. In: P. Wagner, B. Wittrock and R. Whitley, eds., Discourses on society -The shaping of the social science disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 331-358.
  65. Walpen, B., 2004. Die offenen Feinde und ihre Gesellschaft. Hamburg: VSA.
  66. Walters, A.A., 1987. Currency boards. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, eds, The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics, vol. 1. London: Macmillan, 740-742.
  67. Williamson, J., 1990. What Washington means by policy reform. In: J. Williamson, ed. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 5-20.
  68. Williamson, J., 2004. A short history of the Washington consensus. Paper commissioned by Fundación CIDOB for a Conference 'From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance,' Barcelona, 24-25 September. Available from: http://www.iie.com/publications/ papers/williamson0904-2.pdf [Accessed 20 February 2005].