Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan 31;1(1):CD010255.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3.

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Kate E Laver  1 , Zoe Adey-Wakeling  2 , Maria Crotty  1 , Natasha A Lannin  3 , Stacey George  1 , Catherine Sherrington  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Kate E Laver et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation offers an alternate way of delivering rehabilitation services. Information and communication technologies are used to facilitate communication between the healthcare professional and the patient in a remote location. The use of telerehabilitation is becoming more viable as the speed and sophistication of communication technologies improve. However, it is currently unclear how effective this model of delivery is relative to rehabilitation delivered face-to-face or when added to usual care.

Objectives: To determine whether the use of telerehabilitation leads to improved ability to perform activities of daily living amongst stroke survivors when compared with (1) in-person rehabilitation (when the clinician and the patient are at the same physical location and rehabilitation is provided face-to-face); or (2) no rehabilitation or usual care. Secondary objectives were to determine whether use of telerehabilitation leads to greater independence in self-care and domestic life and improved mobility, balance, health-related quality of life, depression, upper limb function, cognitive function or functional communication when compared with in-person rehabilitation and no rehabilitation. Additionally, we aimed to report on the presence of adverse events, cost-effectiveness, feasibility and levels of user satisfaction associated with telerehabilitation interventions.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (June 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library, Issue 6, 2019), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to June 2019), Embase (1974 to June 2019), and eight additional databases. We searched trial registries and reference lists.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of telerehabilitation in stroke. We included studies that compared telerehabilitation with in-person rehabilitation or no rehabilitation. In addition, we synthesised and described the results of RCTs that compared two different methods of delivering telerehabilitation services without an alternative group. We included rehabilitation programmes that used a combination of telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation provided that the greater proportion of intervention was provided via telerehabilitation.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently identified trials on the basis of prespecified inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A third review author moderated any disagreements. The review authors contacted investigators to ask for missing information. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence and interpret findings.

Main results: We included 22 trials in the review involving a total of 1937 participants. The studies ranged in size from the inclusion of 10 participants to 536 participants, and reporting quality was often inadequate, particularly in relation to random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Selective outcome reporting and incomplete outcome data were apparent in several studies. Study interventions and comparisons varied, meaning that, in many cases, it was inappropriate to pool studies. Intervention approaches included post-hospital discharge support programs, upper limb training, lower limb and mobility retraining and communication therapy for people with post-stroke language disorders. Studies were either conducted upon discharge from hospital or with people in the subacute or chronic phases following stroke.

Primary outcome: we found moderate-quality evidence that there was no difference in activities of daily living between people who received a post-hospital discharge telerehabilitation intervention and those who received usual care (based on 2 studies with 661 participants (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.15 to 0.15)). We found low-quality evidence of no difference in effects on activities of daily living between telerehabilitation and in-person physical therapy programmes (based on 2 studies with 75 participants: SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.48).

Secondary outcomes: we found a low quality of evidence that there was no difference between telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation for balance outcomes (based on 3 studies with 106 participants: SMD 0.08, 95%CI -0.30 to 0.46). Pooling of three studies with 569 participants showed moderate-quality evidence that there was no difference between those who received post-discharge support interventions and those who received usual care on health-related quality of life (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.20). Similarly, pooling of six studies (with 1145 participants) found moderate-quality evidence that there was no difference in depressive symptoms when comparing post-discharge tele-support programs with usual care (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.11). We found no difference between groups for upper limb function (based on 3 studies with 170 participants: mean difference (MD) 1.23, 95% CI -2.17 to 4.64, low-quality evidence) when a computer program was used to remotely retrain upper limb function in comparison to in-person therapy. Evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions on the effects of telerehabilitation on mobility or participant satisfaction with the intervention. No studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation; however, five of the studies reported health service utilisation outcomes or costs of the interventions provided within the study. Two studies reported on adverse events, although no serious trial-related adverse events were reported.

Authors' conclusions: While there is now an increasing number of RCTs testing the efficacy of telerehabilitation, it is hard to draw conclusions about the effects as interventions and comparators varied greatly across studies. In addition, there were few adequately powered studies and several studies included in this review were at risk of bias. At this point, there is only low or moderate-level evidence testing whether telerehabilitation is a more effective or similarly effective way to provide rehabilitation. Short-term post-hospital discharge telerehabilitation programmes have not been shown to reduce depressive symptoms, improve quality of life, or improve independence in activities of daily living when compared with usual care. Studies comparing telerehabilitation and in-person therapy have also not found significantly different outcomes between groups, suggesting that telerehabilitation is not inferior. Some studies reported that telerehabilitation was less expensive to provide but information was lacking about cost-effectiveness. Only two trials reported on whether or not any adverse events had occurred; these trials found no serious adverse events were related to telerehabilitation. The field is still emerging and more studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions. In addition, while this review examined the efficacy of telerehabilitation when tested in randomised trials, studies that use mixed methods to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of telehealth interventions are incredibly valuable in measuring outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kate E Laver: none known Zoe Adey‐Wakeling: none known Maria Crotty: none known Natasha A Lannin: none known Stacey George: none known Catherine Sherrington: none known

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Bishop 2014 {published data only}
    1. Bishop D, Miller I, Weiner D, Guilmette T, Mukand J, Feldmann E, et al. Family Intervention: Telephone Tracking (FITT): a pilot stroke outcome study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2014;21 Suppl 1:S63‐S74. - PubMed
Bizovičar 2017 {published data only}
    1. Bizovičar N, Rudolf M, Javh M, Goljar N, Rudel D, Obržan D, et al. Effects of home exercise assisted by written and video instructions in patients after stroke [Učinki vadbe na domu ob pomoči vaj v pisni in video obliki pri bolnikih po možganski kapi]. Rehabilitacija 2016;3:26‐32.
Boter 2004 {published data only}
    1. Boter H, HESTIA Study Group. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of an outreach nursing support program for recently discharged stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:2867‐72. - PubMed
Carey 2007 {published data only}
    1. Carey J, Durfee W, Bhatt E, Nagpal A, Weinstein S, Anderson K, et al. Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007;21(3):216‐32. - PubMed
Chen 2017 {published data only}
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Dong WS, Jin Y, Qiao FL, Zhou YF, et al. Effects of home‐based telesupervising rehabilitation on physical function for stroke survivors with hemiplegia. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017;96(3):152‐60. - PubMed
Chumbler 2012 {published data only}
    1. Chumbler N, Quigley P, Li X, Morey M, Rose D, Sanford J, et al. Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients. Stroke 2012;43:2168‐74. - PubMed
Cramer 2019 {published data only}
    1. Cramer S, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, et al. Telerehabilitation in the home versus therapy in‐clinic for patients with stroke. European Stroke Journal 2018;3, 1 Suppl:590‐1.
    1. Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, et al. Efficacy of home‐based telerehabilitation vs in‐clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology 2019;76(9):1079–87. - PMC - PubMed
Deng 2012 {published data only}
    1. Deng H, Durfee W, Nuckley D, Rheude B, Severson A, Skluzacek K, et al. Complex versus simple ankle movement training in stroke using telerehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2012;92(2):197‐209. - PMC - PubMed
Forducey 2012 {published data only}
    1. Forducey P, Glueckauf R, Bergquist T, Maheu M, Yutsis M. Telehealth for persons with severe functional disabilities and their caregivers: facilitating self‐care management in the home setting. Psychological Services 2012;9(2):144‐62. - PMC - PubMed
Huijgen 2008 {published data only}
    1. Huijgen B, Vollenbroek‐Hutton M, Zampolini M, Opisso E, Bernabeu M, Nieuwenhoven J, et al. Feasibility of a home based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2008;14:249‐56. - PubMed
Kirkness 2017 {published data only}
    1. Kirkness C, Cain K, Becker K, Tirschwell D, Buzaitis A, Weisman P, et al. Randomized trial of telephone versus in‐person delivery of a brief psychosocial intervention in post‐stroke depression. BMC Research Notes 2017;10:500. - PMC - PubMed
Lin 2014 {published data only}
    1. Lin K, Chen C, Chen Y, Huang W, Lai J, Yu S, et al. Bidirectional and multi‐user telerehabilitation system: clinical effect on balance, functional activity, and satisfaction in patients with chronic stroke living in long‐term care facilities. Sensors 2014;14:12451‐66. - PMC - PubMed
Llorens 2015 {published data only}
    1. Llorens R, Noe E, Colomer C, Alcaniz M. Effectiveness, usability and cost benefit of a virtual‐reality based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015;96:418‐25. - PubMed
Mayo 2008 {published data only}
    1. Mayo N, Nadeau L, Ahmed S, White C, Grad R, Huang A, et al. Bridging the gap: the effectiveness of teaming a stroke coordinator with patient's personal physician on the outcome of stroke. Age and Ageing 2008;37:32‐8. - PubMed
Meltzer 2018 {published data only}
    1. Meltzer J, Baird A, Steele R, Harvey S. Computer‐based treatment of poststroke language disorders: a non‐inferiority study of telerehabilitation compared to in‐person service delivery. Aphasiology 2018;32(3):290‐311.
Piron 2008 {published data only}
    1. Piron L, Turolla A, Tonin P, Piccione F, Lain L, Dam M. Satisfaction with care in post‐stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2008;14:257‐60. - PubMed
Piron 2009 {published data only}
    1. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Cortese F, Zampolini M, et al. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual‐reality and telemedicine approach. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2009;41:1016‐20. - PubMed
Rochette 2013 {published data only}
    1. Rochette A, Korner‐Bitensky N, Bishop D, Teasell R, White CL, Bravo G, et al. The YOU CALL–WE CALL randomized clinical trial: impact of a multimodal support intervention after a mild stroke. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2013;6(6):674‐9. - PubMed
Saal 2015 {published data only}
    1. Saal S, Becker C, Lorenz S, Schubert M, Kuss O, Stang A, et al. Effect of a stroke support service in Germany: a randomized trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2015;22(6):429‐36. - PubMed
Smith 2012 {published data only}
    1. Smith G, Egbert N, Palmieri P, Dellman‐Jenkins M, Nanna K. Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomized clinical trial of a web‐based intervention. Rehabilitation Psychology 2012;57(3):196‐206. - PMC - PubMed
Vauth 2016 {published data only}
    1. Vauth F, Richter J, Scibor M, Keidel M. Tele online therapy in patients with aphasia after stroke [Telesprachtehrapie (synchrotel) beia aphasie nach schlaganfall]. Nervenheilkunde 2016;35(3):119‐24.
Wan 2016 {published data only}
    1. Wan LH, Zhang XP, Mo MM, Xiong XN, Ou CL, You LM, et al. Effectiveness of goal‐setting telephone follow‐up on health behaviors of patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2016;25(9):2259‐70. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Adie 2010 {published data only}
    1. Adie K, James M. Does telephone follow‐up improve blood pressure after minor stroke or TIA?. Age and Ageing 2010;39:598‐603. - PubMed
Bergquist 2012 {published data only}
    1. Bergquist T, Yutsis M. The effect of cognitive rehabilitation delivered via instant messaging on functional independence in persons with ABI. Brain Injury 2012;26(4‐5):700‐1.
Burton 2005 {published data only}
    1. Burton C, Gibbon B. Expanding the role of the stroke nurse: a pragmatic clinical trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005;52(6):640‐50. - PubMed
Eames 2013 {published data only}
    1. Eames S, Hoffman T, Worrall L, Read S, Wong A. Randomised controlled trial of an education and support package for stroke patients and their carers. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002538. - PMC - PubMed
Eide 2012 {published data only}
    1. Eide L, Schanke A. Examining computerized working memory training as a supplement to cognitive rehabilitation for patients with an acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2012;26(4‐5):749‐50.
Emmerson 2017 {published data only}
    1. Emmerson KB, Harding KE, Taylor NF. Home exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders compared with standard paper‐based home exercise programmes in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2017;31(8):1068‐77. - PubMed
Gillham 2010 {published data only}
    1. Gillham S, Endacott R. Impact of enhanced secondary prevention on health behaviour in patients following minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2010;24(9):822‐30. - PubMed
Graven 2016 {published data only}
    1. Graven C, Brock K, Hill KD, Cotton S, Joubert L. First year after stroke: an integrated approach focusing on participation goals aiming to reduce depressive symptoms. Stroke 2016;47(11):2820‐7. - PubMed
Held 2018 {published data only}
    1. Held JP, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Encouragement‐induced real‐world upper limb use after stroke by a tracking and feedback device: a study protocol for a multi‐center, assessor‐blinded, randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neurology 2018;25(9):13. - PMC - PubMed
Hodson 2018 {published data only}
    1. Hodson T, Cornwell P, Gustafsson L. Meeting the needs of the mild stroke population through targeted interventions: a pilot study. European Stroke Journal 2018;3 Suppl 1:516.
Hoffman 2010 {published data only}
    1. Hoffman T, Worrall L, Eames S. Measuring outcomes in people who have had a stroke and their carers: can the telephone be used?. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2010;17(2):119‐27. - PubMed
Huijbregts 2010 {published data only}
    1. Huijbregts M, Cameron J, Taylor D, McEwen S, Kagan A, Streiner D. Videoconference delivery of a stroke self‐management program: a mixed methods waiting list randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2010;41:e357.
Jackson 2010 {published data only}
    1. Jackson D, Elsom S, Joubert L, Joubert J. An exploration of the role of the nursing coordinator in a telemedicine based stroke secondary prevention model. International Journal of Stroke 2010;5(1):1.
Joubert 2006 {published data only}
    1. Joubert J, Reid C, Joubert L, Barton D, Ruth D, Jackson D, et al. Risk factor management and depression post stroke: the value of an integrated model of care. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2006;13:84‐90. - PubMed
Joubert 2009 {published data only}
    1. Joubert J, Reid C, Barton D, Cumming T, McLean A, Joubert L, et al. Integrated care improves risk‐factor modification after stroke: initial results of the Integrated Care for the Reduction of Secondary Stroke model. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2009;80:279‐84. - PubMed
Kamwesiga 2018 {published data only}
    1. Kamwesiga H, Eriksson G, Tham K, Fors U, Ndiwalana A, Koch L, et al. A feasibility study of a mobile phone supported family‐centred ADL intervention, F@ce, after stroke in Uganda. Globalization and Health 2018;14:82. - PMC - PubMed
Kerry 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kerry S, Cloud G, Markus H, Khong T, Oakeshott P. Does self monitoring improve blood pressure control in hypertensive stroke patients—first results of a randomised trial. International Journal of Stroke 2010;5 (Suppl 3):6.
Kim 2013 {published data only}
    1. Kim H, Oksoo K. The lifestyle modification coaching program for secondary stroke prevention. Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing 2013;43(3):331‐3. - PubMed
Krpic 2013 {published data only}
    1. Krpic A, Savanovic A, Cikajlo I. Telerehabilitation: remote multimedia‐supported assistance and mobile monitoring of balance training outcomes can facilitate the clinical staff’s effort. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2013;36(2):162‐71. - PubMed
Linder 2015 {published data only}
    1. Linder SM, Rosenfeldt AB, Bay RC, Sahu K, Wolf SL, Alberts JL. Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2015;69(2):no pagination. [DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2015.014498] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Mclaughlin 2010 {published data only}
    1. Mclaughlin M, Nam Y, Sanders S, Yeh S, Chang C, Kennedy B, et al. Virtual environments for stroke recovery: pilot clinical trials for user‐centric patient/clinician distribution platform with tele‐rehabilitation application using haptic devices. International Journal of Stroke 2010;5:66.
Nijenhuis 2017 {published data only}
    1. Nijenhuis SM, Prange‐Lasonder GB, Stienen AH, Rietman JS, Buurke JH. Effects of training with a passive hand orthosis and games at home in chronic stroke: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2017;31(2):207‐16. - PubMed
Palmer 2011 {published data only}
    1. Palmer R, Enderby P, Mortley J, Cooper C, Dixon S, Julious S, et al. Cost effectiveness of aphasia computer therapy compared with usual stimulation for people with long standing aphasia (CACTUS). Results of a pilot study. International Journal of Stroke 2011;5:4. - PubMed
Palmer 2014 {published data only}
    1. Palmer R. Clinical and cost effectiveness of aphasia computer therapy compared with usual stimulation or attention control long term post stroke (CACTUS). Health Technology Assessment 2020 [Epub ahead of print]. - PMC - PubMed
Redzuan 2012 {published data only}
    1. Redzuan N, Engkasan J, Mazlan M, Abdullah S. Effectiveness of a video‐based therapy program at home after acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012;93:2177‐83. - PubMed
Reeves 2017 {published data only}
    1. Reeves MJ, Hughes AK, Woodward AT, Freddolino PP, Coursaris CK, Swierenga SJ, et al. Improving transitions in acute stroke patients discharged to home: the Michigan stroke transitions trial. BMC Neurology 2017;17(1):115. - PMC - PubMed
Song 2010 {published data only}
    1. Song C, Seo S, Lee G. Video game based exercise for upper extremity function rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients. Results from a randomized controlled single blind trial. International Journal of Stroke 2010;5:304.
Van den Berg 2016 {published data only}
    1. Berg M, Crotty M, Liu E, Killington M, Kwakkel G, Wegen E. Early supported discharge by caregiver‐mediated exercises and e‐Health support after stroke: a proof of concept trial. Stroke 2016;47:1885‐92. - PubMed
Zucconi 2012 {published data only}
    1. Zucconi C, Valt V, Agostini M, Turolla A, Tonin P, Piron L. Assessment of a virtual teacher feedback for the recovery of the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012;26:4.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Dawson 2017 {published data only}
    1. Dawson D, Bar Y, McEwen S, Skidmore E, Nalder E, Anderson N, et al. Enhancing participation in everyday life for people with stroke via telerehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Stroke 2017;12 Suppl 4:87.
NCT01655264 {published data only}
    1. NCT01655264. Evaluation of the Gertner Tele‐Motion‐Rehabilitation system for stroke rehabilitation. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01655264 (first received 1 August 2012).
Poulsen 2016 {published data only}
    1. Poulsen MB, Badawey J, Anhøj M, Rostrup E, Ellemann K, Larsson BW, et al. Early web‐based tele‐rehabilitation in stroke patients: a randomised controlled pilot study. European Journal of Neurology 2016;23:460.
Shaughnessy 2012 {published data only}
    1. Shaughnessy M, Stookey A. Reshaping exercise habits and beliefs (REHAB): a randomized trial of home‐based exercise in sub‐acute stroke. Stroke 2012;43(2):Abstract NS 11.
Uswatte 2013 {published data only}
    1. Uswatte G, Taub E, Lum P, Brennan D, Barman J, Gilmone B, et al. Telerehabilitation versus outpatient delivery of constraint induced movement therapy: update on a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94(1):e27‐e28.
Vloothuis 2019 {published data only}
    1. Vloothuis J, Mulder M, Nijland R, Goedhart Q, Konijnenbelt M, Mulder H, et al. Caregiver‐mediated exercises with e‐health support for early supported discharge after stroke (CARE4STROKE): a randomized controlled trial. PLOS One 2019;14(4):e0214241. - PMC - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

ACTRN12617000168358 {published data only}
    1. ACTRN12617000168358. A telehealth transfer package to improve post stroke rehabilitation outcomes. anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370120 (first received 1 February 2017).
ACTRN12618001519246 {published data only}
    1. ACTRN12618001519246. Inspiring Virtual Enabled Resources following Vascular Events (iVERVE) pilot randomised controlled trial in chronic stroke to determine the feasibility and acceptability of e‐health support after stroke. anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375230 (first received 11 September 2018).
Chaparro 2018 {published data only}
    1. Chaparro D, Daviet JC, Borel B, Kammoun B, Salle JY, Tchalla A, et al. Home‐based physical activity incentive and education program in subacute phase of stroke recovery (Ticaa’dom): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018;19(1):68. - PMC - PubMed
Chen 2018 {published data only}
    1. Chen J, Liu M, Sun D, Jin Y, Wang T, Ren C. Effectiveness and neural mechanisms of home‐based telerehabilitation in patients with stroke based on fMRI and DTI. Medicine 2018;97(3):1‐5. - PMC - PubMed
ChiCTR‐IOR‐15006763 {published data only}
    1. ChiCTR‐IOR‐15006763. Effectiveness, safety and cost efficiency of telerehabilitation for stroke patients in hospital and home. chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=11437 (first received 15 July 2015).
Gauthier 2017 {published data only}
    1. Gauthier L, Kane C, Borstad A, Strahl N, Uswatte G, Taub E, et al. VIdeo Game Rehabilitation for OUtpatient Stroke (VIGoROUS): protocol for a multicenter comparative effectiveness trial of in home gamified constraint‐induced movement therapy for rehabilitation of chronic upper extremity hemiparesis. BMC Neurology 2017;17:109. - PMC - PubMed
Koh 2015 {published data only}
    1. Koh G, Yen S, Tay A, Cheong A, Ng Y, Silva D, et al. Singapore Tele‐technology Aided Rehabilitation in Stroke (STARS) trial: protocol of a randomized clinical trial on tele‐rehabilitation for stroke patients. BMC Neurology 2015;15:161. - PMC - PubMed
NCT01350453 {published data only}
    1. NCT01350453. Development and pilot evaluation of a web‐supported programme of constraint induced movement therapy following stroke (LifeCIT). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01350453 (first received 9 May 2011).
NCT02615132 {published data only}
    1. NCT02615132. TeleRehab for stroke patients using mobile technology. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02615132 (first received 26 November 2016).
NCT02665052 {published data only}
    1. NCT02665052. Translating intensive arm rehabilitation in stroke to a telerehabilitation format (TeleBATRAC). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02665052 (first received 27 January 2016).
NCT03228264 {published data only}
    1. NCT03228264. A trial investigating telerehabilitation as an add‐on to face‐to‐face speech and language therapy in post‐stroke aphasia [A randomized controlled, evaluator‐blinded, multi‐center trial investigating telerehabilitation as an add‐on to face‐to‐face speech and language therapy in post‐stroke aphasia]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03228264 (first received 24 July 2017).
NCT03484182 {published data only}
    1. NCT03484182. Efficacy of an interactive web‐based home therapy program after stroke (STRONG) [Efficacy of an interactive web‐based home therapy program in the recovery of arm and hand function following stroke: a randomized trial]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03484182 (first received 30 March 2018).
NCT03531567 {published data only}
    1. NCT03531567. Game‐based home exercise programs in chronic stroke: a feasibility study. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03531567 (first received 21 May 2018).
NCT03759106 {published data only}
    1. NCT03759106. Optimizing a home‐based virtual reality exercise program for chronic stroke patients: a telerehabilitation approach. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03759106 (first received 29 November 2018).
Nguyen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Nguyen V, Poon J, Tokuda L, Sayers J, Wallis R, Dergalust S. Pharmacist telephone interventions improve adherence to stroke preventative medications and reduce stroke risk factors: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2011;42(3):e244.
Ora 2018 {published data only}
    1. Øra H, Kirmess M, Brady M, Winsnes I, Hansen S, Becker F. Telerehabilitation for aphasia ‐ protocol of a pragmatic, exploratory, pilot, randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018;19(208):no pagination. [DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2588-5] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Rodgers 2015 {published data only}
    1. Rodgers H, Shaw L, Cant R, Drummond A, Ford GA, Forster A, et al. Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015;16(1):205. - PMC - PubMed
Sakakibara 2017 {published data only}
    1. Sakakibara B, Lear S, Barr S, Benavente O, Goldsmith C, Silverberg N, et al. Development of a chronic disease management program for stroke survivors using intervention mapping: the stroke coach. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2017;98:1195‐202. - PMC - PubMed
Saywell 2017 {published data only}
    1. Saywell N, Vandal A, Taylor D. Augmented community telerehabilitation intervention to improve outcomes for people with stroke AKTIV ‐ a randomised controlled trial. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2017;43 Suppl 1:166.
Sheehy 2018 {published data only}
    1. Sheehy L, Chapman I, Sviestrup H, Yang C, Bilodeau M, Finestone H. Home‐based virtual reality training after stroke: preliminary data of a telerehabilitation feasibility randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Stroke 2018;13 Suppl 2:207.
Sureshkumar 2018 {published data only}
    1. Sureshkumar K, Murthy G, Kuper H. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the 'Care for Stroke' intervention in India: a smartphone‐enabled, carer supported educational intervention for management of disabilities following stroke. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020098. - PMC - PubMed
Tousignant 2014 {published data only}
    1. Tousignant M, Corriveau H, Kairy D, Berg K, Dubois M, Gosselin S, et al. Tai Chi‐based exercise program provided via telerehabilitation compared to home visits in a post‐stroke population who have returned home without intensive rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized, non‐inferiority clinical trial. Trials 2014;15(42):no pagination. [DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-42] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

American Telemedicine Association 2010
    1. American Telemedicine Association. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Telemedicine and e‐Health 2011;17:662‐5. - PubMed
Appleby 2019
    1. Appleby E, Gill S, Hayes L, Walker T, Walsh M, Kumar S. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: A systematic review. PloS One 2019;14(11):doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225150. - PMC - PubMed
Blacquiere 2017
    1. Blacquiere D, Lindsay MP, Foley N, Taralson C, Alcock S, Balg C, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: telestroke best practice guidelines update 2017. International Journal of Stroke 2017;12(8):886‐95. - PubMed
Brennan 2009
    1. Brennan D, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation and self management. In: Gaggioli A editor(s). Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2009:231‐48. - PubMed
Brochard 2010
    1. Brochard S, Robertson J, Medee B, Remy‐Neris O. What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation?. Current Opinion in Neurology 2010;23:683‐7. - PubMed
Chen 2015
    1. Chen J, Jin W, Zhang X, Xu W, Liu X, Ren C. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2015;24(12):2660‐8. - PubMed
Crichton 2016
    1. Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2016;87(10):1091‐8. - PubMed
Feigin 2017
    1. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circulation Research 2017;120:439‐48. - PubMed
Galea 2019
    1. Galea M. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2019;30(2):473‐83. - PubMed
Greenhalgh 2012
    1. Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open 2012;2(4):e001574. - PMC - PubMed
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, the GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924‐6. - PMC - PubMed
Hamilton 2018
    1. Hamilton C, McCluskey A, Hassett L, Killington M, Lovarini M. Patient and therapist experiences of using affordable feedback‐based technology in rehabilitation: a qualitative study nested in a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2018;32(9):1258‐70. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Hill 2018
    1. Hill AJ, Breslin HM. Asynchronous telepractice in aphasia rehabilitation: outcomes from a pilot study. Aphasiology 2018;32:90‐2.
Kalra 2007
    1. Kalra L, Langhorne P. Facilitating recovery: evidence for organised stroke care. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007;39:97‐102. - PubMed
Kwakkel 2004
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, LIndeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2004;22:281‐99. - PubMed
Langhorne 2011
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011;377:1693‐702. - PubMed
National Institutes of Health 2014
    1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Post stroke rehabilitation fact sheet 2014. ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient‐Caregiver‐Education/Fact‐Sheets/Post‐Str....
Ninnis 2019
    1. Ninnis K, Berg M, Lannin N, George S, Laver K. Information and communication technology use within occupational therapy home assessments: a scoping review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2019;82(3):141‐52.
Piaggio 2012
    1. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW, Altman DG, CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA 2012;308(24):2594‐604. - PubMed
Pollock 2014
    1. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Richardson 2017
    1. Richardson BR, Truter P, Blumke R, Russell TG. Physiotherapy assessment and diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the knee via telerehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2017;23(1):88‐95. - PubMed
Rogante 2010
    1. Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, Giacomozzi C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2010;27:287‐304. - PubMed
Russell 2009
    1. Russell T. Telerehabilitation: a coming of age. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2009;55:5‐6. - PubMed
Schulz 2010
    1. Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332. - PMC - PubMed
Standing 2018
    1. Standing C, Standing S, McDermott ML, Gururajan R, Kiani Mavi R. The paradoxes of telehealth: a review of the literature 2000–2015. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2018;35(1):90‐101.
Stroke Foundation 2017
    1. Stroke Foundation 2017. National Stroke Audit‐ Acute Services Report 2017. Melbourne, Australia 2017.
Tchero 2018
    1. Tchero H, Tabue Teguo M, Lannuzel A, Rusch E. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):doi: 10.2196/10867. - PMC - PubMed
Theodoros 2008
    1. Theodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2008;131:191‐209. - PubMed
Thrift 2017
    1. Thrift AG, Thayabaranathan T, Howard G, Howard VJ, Rothwell PM, Feigin VL, et al. Global stroke statistics. International Journal of Stroke 2017;12(1):13‐32. - PubMed
Ullberg 2016
    1. Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B. Perceived unmet rehabilitation needs 1 year after stroke: an observational study from the Swedish stroke register. Stroke 2016;47(2):539‐41. - PubMed
Van Egmond 2018
    1. Egmond MA, Schaaf M, Vredeveld T, Vollenbroek‐Hutten MM, Berge Henegouwen MI, Klinkenbijl JH, et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy with telerehabilitation in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Physiotherapy 2018;104(3):277‐98. - PubMed
WHO 1989
    1. World Health Organization Task Force on Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy: report of the WHO Task Force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke 1989;20:1407‐31. - PubMed
WHO 2010
    1. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. who.int/classifications/icf/en/ (accessed prior to 12 January 2020).
WHO 2019
    1. World Health Organisation. WHO Guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. who.int/publications‐detail/who‐guideline‐recommendations‐on‐digital‐int... (accessed prior to 12 January 2020).
Winters 2002
    1. Winters J. Telerehabilitation research: emerging opportunities. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2002;4:287‐320. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Laver 2012
    1. Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Laver 2013
    1. Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, George S, Lannin NA, Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed