Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 21;11(4):e1005068.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068. eCollection 2015 Apr.

The genetic legacy of the expansion of Turkic-speaking nomads across Eurasia

Bayazit Yunusbayev  1 , Mait Metspalu  2 , Ene Metspalu  3 , Albert Valeev  4 , Sergei Litvinov  1 , Ruslan Valiev  5 , Vita Akhmetova  4 , Elena Balanovska  6 , Oleg Balanovsky  7 , Shahlo Turdikulova  8 , Dilbar Dalimova  8 , Pagbajabyn Nymadawa  9 , Ardeshir Bahmanimehr  10 , Hovhannes Sahakyan  11 , Kristiina Tambets  12 , Sardana Fedorova  13 , Nikolay Barashkov  13 , Irina Khidiyatova  14 , Evelin Mihailov  15 , Rita Khusainova  14 , Larisa Damba  16 , Miroslava Derenko  17 , Boris Malyarchuk  17 , Ludmila Osipova  18 , Mikhail Voevoda  19 , Levon Yepiskoposyan  20 , Toomas Kivisild  21 , Elza Khusnutdinova  14 , Richard Villems  22
Affiliations

The genetic legacy of the expansion of Turkic-speaking nomads across Eurasia

Bayazit Yunusbayev et al. PLoS Genet. .

Abstract

The Turkic peoples represent a diverse collection of ethnic groups defined by the Turkic languages. These groups have dispersed across a vast area, including Siberia, Northwest China, Central Asia, East Europe, the Caucasus, Anatolia, the Middle East, and Afghanistan. The origin and early dispersal history of the Turkic peoples is disputed, with candidates for their ancient homeland ranging from the Transcaspian steppe to Manchuria in Northeast Asia. Previous genetic studies have not identified a clear-cut unifying genetic signal for the Turkic peoples, which lends support for language replacement rather than demic diffusion as the model for the Turkic language's expansion. We addressed the genetic origin of 373 individuals from 22 Turkic-speaking populations, representing their current geographic range, by analyzing genome-wide high-density genotype data. In agreement with the elite dominance model of language expansion most of the Turkic peoples studied genetically resemble their geographic neighbors. However, western Turkic peoples sampled across West Eurasia shared an excess of long chromosomal tracts that are identical by descent (IBD) with populations from present-day South Siberia and Mongolia (SSM), an area where historians center a series of early Turkic and non-Turkic steppe polities. While SSM matching IBD tracts (> 1cM) are also observed in non-Turkic populations, Turkic peoples demonstrate a higher percentage of such tracts (p-values ≤ 0.01) compared to their non-Turkic neighbors. Finally, we used the ALDER method and inferred admixture dates (~9th-17th centuries) that overlap with the Turkic migrations of the 5th-16th centuries. Thus, our results indicate historical admixture among Turkic peoples, and the recent shared ancestry with modern populations in SSM supports one of the hypothesized homelands for their nomadic Turkic and related Mongolic ancestors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Geographic map of samples included in this study and linguistic tree of Turkic languages.
Panel A) Non-Turkic-speaking populations are shown with light blue, light green, dark green, light brown, and yellow circles, depending on the region. Turkic-speaking populations are shown with red circles regardless of the region of sampling. Full population names are given in S1 Table Panel B) The linguistic tree of Turkic languages is adapted from Dybo 2004 and includes only those languages spoken by the Turkic peoples analyzed in this study. The x-axis shows the time scale in kilo-years (kya). Internal branches are shown with different colors.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Population structure inferred using ADMIXTURE analysis.
ADMIXTURE results at K = 8 are shown. Each individual is represented by a vertical (100%) stacked column indicating the proportions of ancestry in K constructed ancestral populations. Turkic-speaking populations are shown in red. The upper barplot shows only Turkic-speaking populations.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Populations with high and correlated signals of IBD sharing with western Turkic peoples.
Circle positions correspond to population locations. Circle color indicates the amount of excess IBD sharing (shown in Legend) that a population shares with all 12 western Turkic populations. Populations with IBD sharing exceeding the 0.90 quantile are shown with a “plus symbol”. Panel A) IBD sharing signal based on IBD tracts of 1–2 cM. Panel B) IBD sharing signal based on IBD tracts of 2–3 cM. Panel C) IBD sharing signal based on IBD tracts of 3–4 cM
Fig 4
Fig 4. Pairwise IBD sharing based on 1–2 cM long segments.
For each population ordered along the x–axis, IBD sharing is computed with three SSM populations (Tuvans, Buryats, Mongols) and Evenkis. Each Turkic-speaking population (shown in red) is grouped with its respective geographic neighbors using parentheses. The grouped geographic neighbors were pooled and used to perform a permutation test as described in the M&M section. Red numbers under the Turkic population name indicate how many SSM populations demonstrate a statistically significant excess of IBD sharing with a given Turkic population. Note that, for example, Bashkirs, Tatars, and Chuvashes share their geographic neighbors.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Admixture dates for Turkic-speaking populations on an absolute date scale.
Blue circles show ALDER-inferred point estimates and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Gray circles show SPCO-inferred point estimates and error bars in gray indicate 95% confidence intervals. The red bar shows the point estimate range (inferred using ALDER) across all the analyzed samples and the orange bar shows the same for SPCO-inferred dates. Admixture dates before Common Era (CE) are shown with a negative sign.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Admixture dates for simulated populations.
Simulated populations were generated by mixing two ancestral populations G generations ago as described in the M&M section. We repeated each admixture scenario 120 times and analyzed with two admixture dating methods: ALDER and SPCO. Circles represent admixture dates for one simulated population and circle color indicates the method of admixture inference as shown in the legend. Red “plus symbols” show the true admixture date.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • POPULATION GENETICS. Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans.
    Raghavan M, Steinrücken M, Harris K, Schiffels S, Rasmussen S, DeGiorgio M, Albrechtsen A, Valdiosera C, Ávila-Arcos MC, Malaspinas AS, Eriksson A, Moltke I, Metspalu M, Homburger JR, Wall J, Cornejo OE, Moreno-Mayar JV, Korneliussen TS, Pierre T, Rasmussen M, Campos PF, de Barros Damgaard P, Allentoft ME, Lindo J, Metspalu E, Rodríguez-Varela R, Mansilla J, Henrickson C, Seguin-Orlando A, Malmström H, Stafford T Jr, Shringarpure SS, Moreno-Estrada A, Karmin M, Tambets K, Bergström A, Xue Y, Warmuth V, Friend AD, Singarayer J, Valdes P, Balloux F, Leboreiro I, Vera JL, Rangel-Villalobos H, Pettener D, Luiselli D, Davis LG, Heyer E, Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS, Smith CI, Grimes V, Pike KA, Deal M, Fuller BT, Arriaza B, Standen V, Luz MF, Ricaut F, Guidon N, Osipova L, Voevoda MI, Posukh OL, Balanovsky O, Lavryashina M, Bogunov Y, Khusnutdinova E, Gubina M, Balanovska E, Fedorova S, Litvinov S, Malyarchuk B, Derenko M, Mosher MJ, Archer D, Cybulski J, Petzelt B, Mitchell J, Worl R, Norman PJ, Parham P, Kemp BM, Kivisild T, Tyler-Smith C, Sandhu MS, Crawford M, Villems R, Smith DG, Waters MR, Goebel T, Johnson JR, Malhi RS, Jakobsson M, Meltzer DJ, Manica A, Durbin R, Bustamante… See abstract for full author list ➔ Raghavan M, et al. Science. 2015 Aug 21;349(6250):aab3884. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3884. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Science. 2015. PMID: 26198033 Free PMC article.
  • Toward high-resolution population genomics using archaeological samples.
    Morozova I, Flegontov P, Mikheyev AS, Bruskin S, Asgharian H, Ponomarenko P, Klyuchnikov V, ArunKumar G, Prokhortchouk E, Gankin Y, Rogaev E, Nikolsky Y, Baranova A, Elhaik E, Tatarinova TV. Morozova I, et al. DNA Res. 2016 Aug;23(4):295-310. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw029. Epub 2016 Jul 19. DNA Res. 2016. PMID: 27436340 Free PMC article. Review.
  • East Eurasian ancestry in the middle of Europe: genetic footprints of Steppe nomads in the genomes of Belarusian Lipka Tatars.
    Pankratov V, Litvinov S, Kassian A, Shulhin D, Tchebotarev L, Yunusbayev B, Möls M, Sahakyan H, Yepiskoposyan L, Rootsi S, Metspalu E, Golubenko M, Ekomasova N, Akhatova F, Khusnutdinova E, Heyer E, Endicott P, Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Metspalu M, Davydenko O, Villems R, Kushniarevich A. Pankratov V, et al. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 25;6:30197. doi: 10.1038/srep30197. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27453128 Free PMC article.
  • Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of Sheep Breeds in the Kyrgyzstan.
    Deniskova T, Dotsev A, Lushihina E, Shakhin A, Kunz E, Medugorac I, Reyer H, Wimmers K, Khayatzadeh N, Sölkner J, Sermyagin A, Zhunushev A, Brem G, Zinovieva N. Deniskova T, et al. Front Genet. 2019 Dec 12;10:1311. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01311. eCollection 2019. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 31921318 Free PMC article.
  • Population genetics, diversity and forensic characteristics of Tai-Kadai-speaking Bouyei revealed by insertion/deletions markers.
    He G, Ren Z, Guo J, Zhang F, Zou X, Zhang H, Wang Q, Ji J, Yang M, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Nabijiang Y, Huang J, Wang CC. He G, et al. Mol Genet Genomics. 2019 Oct;294(5):1343-1357. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01584-6. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Mol Genet Genomics. 2019. PMID: 31197471
See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Renfrew C. Archaeogenetics—towards a 'new synthesis'? Curr Biol. 2010;20(4):R162–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.056 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinor D. The establishment and dissolution of the Turk empire In: Sinor D, editor. The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 285–316.
    1. Findley CV. The Turks in world history New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. 320 p.
    1. Golden PB. Central Asia in World History: Oxford University Press; 2011. 176 p.
    1. Johanson L. The Structure of Turkic In: Johanson L, Csató EA, editors. The Turkic languages. London & New York: Routledge & Chapman & Hall; 1998. p. 67–80.

Publication types

MeSH terms