Human enhancement: The new eugenics
- PMID: 25249705
- PMCID: PMC4135459
- DOI: 10.1179/2050854914Y.0000000021
Human enhancement: The new eugenics
Abstract
Supporters of human enhancement through genetic and other reproductive technologies claim that the new liberal eugenics, based on science and individual consent differs from the old eugenics which was unscientific and coercive. Supporters claim it is the parent's moral obligation to produce the best children possible. At this time, a defective gene that is identified in an unborn child cannot be repaired. To prevent the manifestation of the undesirable trait the unborn child is destroyed. The arguments in support of human enhancement are based on an ethic of consequence that could allow for nearly any means as long as the desired end is reached. Medical enhancement may affect the parent-child family unit; the parents' love for the child may be conditioned on the expected results. The new eugenics, although based on science, continues to pursue the same goal as the old eugenics, the development of a superior individual and the elimination of those considered inferior.
Keywords: Eugenics; Human enhancement.
Similar articles
-
Imagining human enhancement: whose future, which rationality?Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28(6):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s11017-007-9055-8. Theor Med Bioeth. 2007. PMID: 18322820
-
Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Feb;17(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9485-1. Med Health Care Philos. 2014. PMID: 23728949
-
Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):696-700. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102400. Epub 2014 Nov 4. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25370604 Review.
-
Eugenics discourse and racial improvement in Republican China (1911-1949).Uisahak. 2010 Dec 31;19(2):459-85. Uisahak. 2010. PMID: 21330778
-
[Scandinavian eugenics: Nordic historians provide new approaches].Med Sci (Paris). 2004 Oct;20(10):916-25. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20042010916. Med Sci (Paris). 2004. PMID: 15461971 Review. French.
Cited by
-
CRISPR-Cas and Its Wide-Ranging Applications: From Human Genome Editing to Environmental Implications, Technical Limitations, Hazards and Bioethical Issues.Cells. 2021 Apr 21;10(5):969. doi: 10.3390/cells10050969. Cells. 2021. PMID: 33919194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 May;41(5):1153-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 38512655 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Black, E. 2003 The Horrifying American roots of Nazi Eugenics, Truth11, George Mason University, Center for History and New Media. http://truth11.com/2009/07/10/the-horrifying-american-roots-of-nazi-euge...
-
- Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 2010. Protective effect of sickle cell trait against malaria-associated mortality and morbidity. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biology/sickle_cell.html
-
- Grant, G.1995. Killer angel. Franklin, TN: Ars Vitae Press
-
- Harris, J.2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton: Princeton University Press
-
- International Down Syndrome Coalition for Life (IDSC). 2009. Down syndrome: Facts, stats, concern of eugenics. http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/1301/26
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources