Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;7(6):647-62.

Effectiveness of physical therapist administered spinal manipulation for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Effectiveness of physical therapist administered spinal manipulation for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

John J Kuczynski et al. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background context: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disorder in society that has been associated with increased loss of work time and medical expenses. A common intervention for LBP is spinal manipulation, a technique that is not specific to one scope of practice or profession.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of physical therapy spinal manipulations for the treatment of patients with low back pain.

Methods: A search of the current literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Pro Quest Nursing and Allied Health Source, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Studies were included if each involved: 1) individuals with LBP; 2) spinal manipulations performed by physical therapists compared to any control group that did not receive manipulations; 3) measurable clinical outcomes or efficiency of treatment measures, and 4) randomized control trials. The quality of included articles was determined by two independent authors using the criteria developed and used by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).

Results: Six randomized control trials met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The most commonly used outcomes in these studies were some variation of pain rating scales and disability indexes. Notable results included varying degrees of effect sizes favoring physical therapy spinal manipulations and minimal adverse events resulting from this intervention. Additionally, the manipulation group in one study reported statistically significantly less medication use, health care utilization, and lost work time.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this systematic review there is evidence to support the use of spinal manipulation by physical therapists in clinical practice. Physical therapy spinal manipulation appears to be a safe intervention that improves clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain.

Keywords: Low back pain; manipulation; manual therapy; spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow for the systematic review.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Assendelft WJJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain: a meta‐analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med. 2004;138:871‐81 - PubMed
    1. Waddell G. Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine. 1996;21:2820‐5 - PubMed
    1. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost‐of‐illness study of back pain in the netherlands. Pain. 1995;62:233‐40 - PubMed
    1. Dagenais S, Gay RE, Tricco AC, et al. NASS contemporary concepts in spine care: spinal manipulation therapy for acute low back pain. Spine J. 2010;10:918‐40 - PubMed
    1. Loney PL, Stratford PW. The prevalence of low back pain in adults: a methodological review of the literature. Phys Ther. 1999;79:384‐96 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources