Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD009138.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009138.pub2.

Amitriptyline versus placebo for major depressive disorder

Affiliations
Review

Amitriptyline versus placebo for major depressive disorder

Claudia Leucht et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant that was synthesised in 1960 and introduced as early as 1961 in the USA, but is still regularly used. It has also been frequently used as an active comparator in trials on newer antidepressants and can therefore be called a 'benchmark' antidepressant. However, its efficacy and safety compared to placebo in the treatment of major depression has not been assessed in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To assess the effects of amitriptyline compared to placebo or no treatment for major depressive disorder in adults.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) to August 2012. This register contains relevant randomised controlled trials from: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). The reference lists of reports of all included studies were screened and manufacturers of amitriptyline contacted for details of additional studies.

Selection criteria: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing amitriptyline with placebo or no treatment in patients with major depressive disorder as diagnosed by operationalised criteria.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data. For dichotomous data, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using standardised mean differences (with 95% CI). We used a random-effects model throughout.

Main results: The review includes 39 trials with a total of 3509 participants. Study duration ranged between three and 12 weeks. Amitriptyline was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving acute response (18 RCTs, n = 1987, OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.21 to 3.23). Significantly fewer participants allocated to amitriptyline than to placebo withdrew from trials due to inefficacy of treatment (19 RCTs, n = 2017, OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.28), but more amitriptyline-treated participants withdrew due to side effects (19 RCTs, n = 2174, OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.71 to 6.35). Amitriptyline also caused more anticholinergic side effects, tachycardia, dizziness, nervousness, sedation, tremor, dyspepsia, sedation, sexual dysfunction and weight gain. In subgroup and meta-regression analyses the results of the primary outcome were robust towards publication year (1971 to 1997), mean participant age at baseline, mean amitriptyline dose, study duration in weeks, pharmaceutical sponsor, inpatient versus outpatient setting and two-arm versus three-arm design. However, higher severity at baseline was associated with higher superiority of amitriptyline (P = 0.02), while higher responder rates in the placebo groups were associated with lower superiority of amitriptyline (P = 0.05). The results of the primary outcome were rather homogeneous, reflecting comparability of the trials. However, methods of randomisation, allocation concealment and blinding were usually poorly reported. Not all studies used intention-to-treat analyses and in many of them standard deviations were not reported and often had to be imputed. Funnel plots suggested a possible publication bias, but the trim and fill method did not change the overall effect size much (seven adjusted studies, OR 2.64, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.10).

Authors' conclusions: Amitriptyline is an efficacious antidepressant drug. It is, however, also associated with a number of side effects. Degree of placebo response and severity of depression at baseline may moderate drug-placebo efficacy differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Stefan Leucht: has received honoraria for consulting/advisory boards from Alkermes, BristolMyersSquibb, EliLilly, Janssen, Johnson&Johnson, Medavante, Roche, lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, BristolMyersSquibb, EliLilly, EssexPharma, Janssen, Johnson&Johnson, Lundbeck Institute, Pfizer and SanofiAventis, and EliLilly has provided medication for a trial with SL as the primary investigator.

Claudia Leucht: is Stefan Leucht's wife. Therefore, his conflicts of interest in part also apply to her. She has no other conflicts of interest.

Maximilian Huhn: none to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Response.
5
5
6
6
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Response.
7
7
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 1 Response.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 2 Remission.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 3 Mean severity of depression ‐ change scores.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mean severity of depression ‐ endpoint scores.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 5 Drop‐out: total.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 6 Drop‐out: due to inefficacy.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 7 Drop‐out: due to adverse events.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 8 Side effects ‐ total number of patients experiencing at least one side effect.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 9 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: any anticholinergic effects (dry mouth, constipation, visual disturbances).
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 10 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: constipation.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 11 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: dry mouth.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 12 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: nasal congestion.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 13 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: urination problems.
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 14 Side effects ‐ anticholinergic: vision problems (amblyopia, blurred vision).
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 15 Side effects ‐ cardiovascular: hypertension.
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 16 Side effects ‐ cardiovascular: hypotension.
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 17 Side effects ‐ cardiovascular: lightheadedness.
1.18
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 18 Side effects ‐ cardiovascular: palpitations.
1.19
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 19 Side effects ‐ cardiovascular: tachycardia.
1.20
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 20 Side effects ‐ central nervous: agitation.
1.21
1.21. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 21 Side effects ‐ central nervous: amnesia.
1.22
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 22 Side effects ‐ central nervous: confusion.
1.23
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 23 Side effects ‐ central nervous: disco‐ordination.
1.24
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 24 Side effects ‐ central nervous: dizziness.
1.25
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 25 Side effects ‐ central nervous: headache.
1.26
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 26 Side effects ‐ central nervous: increased activity.
1.27
1.27. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 27 Side effects ‐ central nervous: insomnia.
1.28
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 28 Side effects ‐ central nervous: nervousness.
1.29
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 29 Side effects ‐ central nervous: sedation/sleepiness/somnolence/drowsiness.
1.30
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 30 Side effects ‐ central nervous: tremor.
1.31
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 31 Side effects ‐ dermal: rash.
1.32
1.32. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 32 Side effects ‐ dermal: sweating.
1.33
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 33 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: anorexia.
1.34
1.34. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 34 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: diarrhoea.
1.35
1.35. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 35 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: dyspepsia.
1.36
1.36. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 36 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: gastralgia.
1.37
1.37. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 37 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: increased appetite.
1.38
1.38. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 38 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: nausea.
1.39
1.39. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 39 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: vomiting.
1.40
1.40. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 40 Side effects ‐ gastrointestinal: weight gain.
1.41
1.41. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 41 Side effects ‐ general: fatigue/asthenia/slowed down.
1.42
1.42. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 42 Side effects ‐ sexual: impotence.
1.43
1.43. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 43 Side effects ‐ sexual: any sexual dysfunction.
1.44
1.44. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 44 Subgroup analysis: industry sponsored ‐ response to treatment.
1.45
1.45. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 45 Subgroup analysis: inpatient versus outpatient studies ‐ response to treatment.
1.46
1.46. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 46 Subgroup analysis: two‐arms versus three‐arms studies ‐ response to treatment.
1.47
1.47. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 47 Sensitivity analysis: devoid of studies calculated with imputed statistic methods ‐ response to treatment.
1.48
1.48. Analysis
Comparison 1 Amitriptyline versus placebo, Outcome 48 Sensitivity analysis: fixed instead of random‐effects model ‐ response to treatment.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009138

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Amsterdam 1986 {published data only}
    1. Amsterdam JD, Case WG, Csanalosi E, Singer M, Rickels K. A double‐blind comparative trial of zimelidine, amitriptyline, and placebo in patients with mixed anxiety and depression. Pharmacopsychiatry 1986;19(3):115‐9. - PubMed
Bakish 1992 {published data only}
    1. Bakish D, Bradwejn J, Nair N, McClure J, Remick R, Bulger L. A comparison of moclobemide, amitriptyline and placebo in depression: a Canadian multicentre study. Psychopharmacology 1992;106(Suppl):S98‐101. - PubMed
    1. Bakish D, Wiens A, Ellis J, Alda M, Lapierre Y. A double‐blind placebo‐controlled comparison of moclobemide and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 1992;37(Suppl 1):12‐7. - PubMed
Bhatia 1991 {published data only}
    1. Bhatia SC, Hsieh HH, Theesen KA, Townley RG, Andersen JM, Weiss S, et al. Platelet alpha‐2 adrenoreceptor activity pre‐treatment and post‐treatment in major depressive disorder with melancholia. Research Communication in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology 1991;74(1):47‐57. - PubMed
Blashki 1971 {published data only}
    1. Blashki TG, Mowbray R, Davies B. Controlled trial of amitriptyline in general practice. British Medical Journal 1971;1(741):133‐8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blashki TG, Mowbray RM, Davies BM. A controlled trial of an antidepressant (amitriptyline) in general practice. V World Congress of Psychiatry, Ciudad de Mexico, 28 November ‐ 4 December 1971. [CN‐00216475]
    1. Blashki TG, Mowbray RM, Davies BM. A controlled trial of an antidepressant (amitriptyline) in general‐practice. V World Congress of Psychiatry, Ciudad de Mexico, 28 November ‐ 4 December 1971:409.
Bremner 1995 {published data only}
    1. Bremner JD. A double‐blind comparison of Org 3770, amitriptyline, and placebo in major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1995;56(11):519‐25. - PubMed
    1. Bremner JD. Double‐blind comparison of mirtazapine, amitriptyline and placebo in major depression. Nervenheilkunde 1996;15(8):533‐40.
Carman 1991 {published data only}
    1. Carman JS, Ahdieh H, Wyatt‐Knowles E, Warga E, Panagides J. A controlled study of mianserin in moderately to severely depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1991;27(2):135‐9. - PubMed
Claghorn 1983 {published data only}
    1. Claghorn J, Gershon S, Goldstein BJ. Zimeldine tolerability in comparison to amitriptyline and placebo: findings from a multicentre trial. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;68(Suppl 308):104‐14. - PubMed
    1. Claghorn J, Gershon S, Goldstein BJ, Behrnetz S, Bush DF, Huitfeldt B. A double‐blind evaluation of zimelidine in comparison to placebo and amitriptyline in patients with major depressive disorder. Progress in Neuro‐Psychopharmacological and Biological Psychiatry 1983;7(2‐3):367‐82. - PubMed
Feighner 1979 {published data only}
    1. Feighner JP, Brauzer B, Gelenberg AJ, Gomez W, Kiev A, Kurland ML, et al. A placebo‐controlled multicenter trial of Limbitrol versus its components (amitriptyline and chlordiazepoxide) in the symptomatic treatment of depressive illness. Psychopharmacology 1979;61(2):217‐25. - PubMed
Gelenberg 1990 {published data only}
    1. Gelenberg AJ, Wojcik JD, Falk WE, Spring B, Brotman AW, Galvin Nadeau M. Clovoxamine in the treatment of depressed outpatients: a double‐blind, parallel‐group comparison against amitriptyline and placebo. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1990;31(4):307‐14. - PubMed
    1. Spring B, Gelenberg AJ, Garvin R, Thompson S. Amitriptyline, clovoxamine and cognitive function: a placebo‐controlled comparison in depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology 1992;108(3):327‐32. - PubMed
Georgotas 1982 {published data only}
    1. Georgotas A, Krakowski M, Gershon S. Controlled trial of zimelidine, a 5‐HT reuptake inhibitor, for treatment of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1982;139(8):1057‐8. - PubMed
Hicks 1988 {published data only}
    1. Hicks F, Robins E, Murphy GE. Comparison of adinazolam, amitriptyline, and placebo in the treatment of melancholic depression. Psychiatry Research 1988;23(2):221‐7. - PubMed
Hormazabal 1985 {published data only}
    1. Hormazabal L, Omer LM, Ismail S. Cianopramine and amitriptyline in the treatment of depressed patients ‐ a placebo‐controlled study. Psychopharmacology 1985;86:205‐8. - PubMed
Hoschl 1989 {published data only}
    1. Hoschl C, Kozeny J. Verapamil in affective disorders: a controlled, double‐blind study. Biological Psychiatry 1989;25(2):128‐40. - PubMed
Jacobson 1990 {published data only}
    1. Bech P. Meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled trials with mirtazapine using the core items of the Hamilton Depression Scale as evidence of a pure antidepressive effect in the short‐term treatment of major depression. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;4:337‐45. [DOI: 10.1017/S1461145701002565] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobson AF, Dominguez RA, Goldstein B, Gandara J. Comparison of ORG‐3770 and amitriptyline in depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology 1990;30:851.
Katz 1993 {published data only}
    1. Katz RJ, Lott M, Landau P, Waldmeier P. A clinical test of noradrenergic involvement in the therapeutic mode of action of an experimental antidepressant. Biological Psychiatry 1993;33:261‐6. - PubMed
Katz 1993a {published data only}
    1. Katz RJ, Lott M, Landau P, Waldmeier P. A clinical test of noradrenergic involvement in the therapeutic mode of action of an experimental antidepressant. Biological Psychiatry 1993;33:261‐6. - PubMed
Klieser 1988 {published data only}
    1. Klieser E, Lehmann E. Experimental comparison between the effect of standardized trazodone‐amitriptyline and placebo treatment in vitalized depressive patients. Psychopharmacology 1988;95(Suppl):3‐5. - PubMed
    1. Klieser E, Lehmann E. Experimental examination of trazodone. Clinical Neuropharmacology 1989;12(Suppl 1):18‐24. - PubMed
Kupfer 1979 {published data only}
    1. Kupfer DJ, Coble PA, Rubinstein D. Changes in weight during treatment for depression. Psychosomatic Medicine 1979;41(7):535‐44. - PubMed
    1. Kupfer DJ, Hanin I, Spiker D. Amitriptyline plasma levels and clinical response in primary depression: II. Communications in Psychopharmacology 1978;2(5):441‐50. [0145‐5699] - PubMed
Kusalic 1993 {published data only}
    1. Kusalic M, Engelsmann F, Bradwejn J. Thyroid functioning during treatment for depression. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 1993;18(5):260‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Langlois 1985 {published data only}
    1. Langlois R, Cournoyer G, Montigny C, Caille G. High incidence of multisystemic reactions to zimeldine. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1985;28(1):67‐71. - PubMed
Lydiard 1997 {published data only}
    1. Lydiard RB, Stahl SM, Hertzman M, Harrison WM. A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study comparing the effects of sertraline versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1997;58(11):484‐91. - PubMed
McNair 1984a {published data only}
    1. McNair DM, Kahn RJ, Frankenthaler LM, Faldetta LL. Amoxapine and amitriptyline II Specificity of cognitive effects during brief treatment of depression. Psychopharmacology 1984; Vol. 83, issue 2:134‐9. - PubMed
    1. McNair DM, Kahn RJ, Frankenthaler LM, Faldetta LL. Amoxapine and amitriptyline. I. Relative speed of antidepressant action. Psychopharmacology 1984;83(2):129‐33. - PubMed
Mynors‐Wallis 1995 {published data only}
    1. Mynors‐Wallis LM, Gath DH. Predictors of treatment outcome for major depression in primary care. Psychological Medicine 1997;27:731‐736. - PubMed
    1. Mynors‐Wallis LM, Gath DH, Lloyd‐Thomas AR, Tomlinson D. Randomised controlled trial comparing problem solving treatment with amitriptyline and placebo for major depression in primary care. BMJ 1995;310(6977):441‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Organon 3‐020 unpublished {unpublished data only}
    1. Bech P. Meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled trials with mirtazapine using the core items of the Hamilton Depression Scale as evidence of a pure antidepressive effect in the short‐term treatment of major depression. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;4:337‐45. [DOI: 10.1017/S1461145701002565] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Organon 3‐020. [personal communication from the pharmaceutical company]
Organon 84062 unpublished {published data only}
    1. Organon 84062. [personal communication from the pharmaceutical company]
Paykel 1988a {published data only}
    1. Hollyman JA, Freeling P, Paykel ES, Bhat A, Sedgwick P. Double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of amitriptyline among depressed patients in general practice. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1988;38(314):393‐7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Organon 84062.
    1. Paykel ES, Freeling P, Hollyman JA. Are tricyclic antidepressants useful for mild depression? A placebo controlled trial. Pharmacopsychiatry 1988;21(1):15‐8. - PubMed
    1. Paykel ES, Hollyman JA, Freeling P, Sedgwick P. Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo‐controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders 1988;14(1):83‐95. - PubMed
Preskorn 1983 {published data only}
    1. Preskorn SH. Antidepressant response and plasma concentrations of bupropion. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1983;44(5 Pt 2):137‐9. - PubMed
Raft 1981 {published data only}
    1. Raft D, Davidson J, Wasik J, Mattox A. Relationship between response to phenelzine and MAO inhibition in a clinical trial of phenelzine, amitriptyline and placebo. Neuropsychobiology 1981;7(3):122‐6. - PubMed
Reimherr 1990 {published data only}
    1. Lapierre YD. Controlling acute episodes of depression. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1991; Vol. 6, issue Suppl 2:23‐35. - PubMed
    1. Reimherr FW, Byerley WF, Ward MF, Lebegue BJ, Wender PH. Sertraline, a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake, for the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorder. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1988;24(1):200‐5. - PubMed
    1. Reimherr FW, Chouinard G, Cohn CK, Cole JO, Itil TM, LaPierre YD, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of sertraline: a double‐blind, placebo‐ and amitriptyline‐controlled, multicenter comparison study in outpatients with major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1990;51(Suppl B):18‐27. - PubMed
Rickels 1982 {published data only}
    1. Rickels K, Case WG. Trazodone in depressed outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry 1982;139(6):803‐6. - PubMed
Rickels 1985 {published data only}
    1. Rickels K, Feighner JP, Smith WT. Alprazolam, amitriptyline, doxepin, and placebo in the treatment of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1985;42(2):134‐41. - PubMed
Roffman 1982 {published data only}
    1. Roffman M, Gould E, Brewer S, Lau H, Sachais B, Dixon N, et al. Comparative anticholinergic activity of oxaprotiline and amitriptyline. Drug Development Research 1983;3(6):561‐6.
    1. Roffman M, Gould EF, Brewer SJ, Lau H, Sachais B, Dixon RB, et al. A double blind comparative study of oxaprotiline with amitriptyline and placebo in moderate depression. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1982;32(2):247‐56.
    1. Stassen HH, Angst J, Delina‐Stula A. Delayed onset of action of antidepressant drugs? Survey of recent results. European Psychiatry 1997; Vol. 12, issue 4:166‐76. - PubMed
    1. Stassen HH, Delini‐Stula A, Angst J. Time course of improvement under antidepressant treatment: a survival‐analytical approach. European Neuropsychopharmacology 1993;3:127‐35. - PubMed
Rowan 1980 {published data only}
    1. Bhat AV, Rowan PR, Paykel ES. Responses to phenelzine and amitriptyline absence of differential predictors by multiple regression analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 1984;6(2):209‐18. - PubMed
    1. Paykel ES, Rowan PR, Parker RR, Bhat AV. Response to phenelzine and amitriptyline in subtypes of outpatient depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 1982;39(9):1041‐9. - PubMed
    1. Rowan P, Paykel ES, Parker PR, West E. Comparative effects of phenelzine and amitriptyline: a placebo controlled trial. Neuropharmacology 1980;19(12):1223‐5. - PubMed
Shipley 1981 {published data only}
    1. Shipley JE, Kupfer DJ, Spiker DG, Shaw DH, Coble PA, Neil JF, et al. Neuropsychological assessment and EEG sleep in affective disorders. Biological Psychiatry 1981;16(10):907‐18. - PubMed
Smith 1990 {published data only}
    1. Smith WT, Glaudin V, Panagides J, Gilvary E. Mirtazapine vs amitriptyline vs placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1990;26(2):191‐6. - PubMed
Stratas 1984 {published data only}
    1. Stratas NE. A double‐blind study of the efficacy and safety of dothiepin hydrochloride in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1984;45(11):466‐9. - PubMed
Thomson 1982 {published data only}
    1. Thomson J, Rankin H, Ashcroft GW, Yates CM, McQueen JK, Cummings SW. The treatment of depression in general‐practice: a comparison of L‐tryptophan, amitriptyline, and a combination of L‐tryptophan and amitriptyline with placebo. Psychological Medicine 1982;12(4):741‐51. - PubMed
van de Merwe 1984a {published data only}
    1. Merwe TJ, Silverstone T, Ankier SI, Warrington SJ, Turner P. A double‐blind non‐crossover placebo‐controlled study between group comparison of trazodone and amitriptyline on cardiovascular function in major depressive disorder. Psychopathology 1984;17(Suppl 2):64‐76. - PubMed
Wilcox 1994 {published data only}
    1. Wilcox CS, Cohn JB, Katz BB, Mijares CP, Guarino JJ, Panagides J, et al. A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study comparing mianserin and amitriptyline in moderately depressed outpatients. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1994;9(4):271‐9. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Anon 1971 {published data only}
    1. Anon. Multihospital controlled comparison of the therapeutic effects of four antidepressants. Activitas Nervosa Superior 1971;13(3):166‐7. - PubMed
Barton 1972 {published data only}
    1. Barton JL, Snaith RP. A clinical assessment of a sustained release preparation of amitriptyline. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1972;1(3):123‐9. - PubMed
Beasley 1990 {published data only}
    1. Beasley CM, Jr, Sayler ME, Cunningham GE, Weiss AM, Masica DN. Fluoxetine in tricyclic refractory major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 1990;20(3):193‐200. - PubMed
Bellack 1981 {published data only}
    1. Bellack AS, Hersen M, Himmelhoch J. Social skills training compared with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in the treatment of unipolar depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1981;138(12):1562‐7. - PubMed
Bente 1974 {published data only}
    1. Bente D, Feder J, Helmchen H, Hippius H, Rosenberg L. Double blind test of three antidepressants. 3. Methodical problems. Arzneimittelforschung 1974;24(2):205‐7. - PubMed
Bergener 1968 {published data only}
    1. Bergener M. Clinical examination of antidepressive acting substances in double‐blind test. Arzneimittelforschung 1968;18(2):245‐9. - PubMed
Branconnier 1982 {published data only}
    1. Branconnier RJ, Cole JO, Ghazvinian S, Rosenthal S. Treating the depressed elderly patient: the comparative behavioral pharmacology of mianserin and amitriptyline. Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology 1982;32:195‐212. - PubMed
Browne 1963 {published data only}
    1. Browne M, Kreeger L, Kazamia NG. A clinical trial of amitriptyline in depressive patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 1963;109:692‐4. - PubMed
Bruck 1974 {published data only}
    1. Bruck J, Söllner E, Tschabitscher H. Results of the clinical testing of amitriptylin and C 34,276‐Ba (dibenzobicyclooctadiene derivative) in a double‐blind study. Der Nervenarzt 1974;45(9):492‐6. - PubMed
Burrows 1980 {published data only}
    1. Burrows GD, Norman TR, Davies BM. A comparative study of amoxapine and amitriptyline for depressive illness. Australian Family Physician 1980;9(11):762‐6. - PubMed
Claghorn 1984 {published data only}
    1. Claghorn JL, Schroeder J, Goldstein BJ, 2nd. Comparison of the electrocardiographic effect of dothiepin and amitriptyline. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1984;45(7):291‐3. - PubMed
Coble 1981 {published data only}
    1. Coble PA, Kupfer DJ, Shaw DH. Distribution of REM latency in depression. Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery 1981;16(5):453‐66. - PubMed
Cosyns 1974 {published data only}
    1. Cosyns P. A single daily dose of a sustained release form of amitriptyline in depressive illness. Acta Psychiatrica Belgica 1974;74(4):430‐6. - PubMed
Davis 1967 {published data only}
    1. Davis WG. Treatment of anxiety and depression. A double‐blind study of a perphenazine and amitriptyline in combination. Rocky Mountain Medical Journal 1967;64(11):73‐6. - PubMed
DiMascio 1974 {published data only}
    1. DiMascio A. Drug therapy of depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1974;10:57.
Downing 1972 {published data only}
    1. Downing RW, Rickels K. Predictors of amitriptyline response in outpatient depressives. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1972;154(4):248‐63. [CN‐00007057] - PubMed
Downing 1973 {published data only}
    1. Downing RW, Rickels K. Predictors of response to amitriptyline and placebo in three outpatient treatment settings. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1973;156(2):109‐29. - PubMed
Downing 1979 {published data only}
    1. Downing RW, Rickels K, Rickels LA, Downing D. Nonspecific factors and side effect complaints. Factors affecting the incidence of drowsiness in drug and placebo treated anxious and depressed outpatients. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1979;60(5):438‐48. - PubMed
Downing 1983 {published data only}
    1. Downing RW, Rickels K. Physician prognosis in relationship to drug and placebo response in anxious and depressed psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1983;171(3):182‐5. [CN‐00030322] - PubMed
Ellingson 1973 {published data only}
    1. Ellingson. BC‐105 vs amitriptyline vs placebo. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1973;9:78‐82.
Fisch 1992 {published data only}
    1. Fisch C, Knoebel SB. Electrocardiographic findings in sertraline depression trials. Drug Investigations 1992;4(4):305‐12.
Friedman 1974 {published data only}
    1. Friedman AS. Drug and family therapy in depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1974;10:18‐9.
Friedman 1975 {published data only}
    1. Friedman AS. Interaction of drug therapy with marital therapy in depressive patients. Archives of General Psychiatry 1975;32(5):619‐37. - PubMed
Friedman 1976 {published data only}
    1. Friedman AS. Drug and family therapy in depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1976;12(3):82‐3. [0048‐5764]
Friedman 1980 {published data only}
    1. Friedman J, McCallum P, Meares R. Stimulus intensity control in depression: a study of the comparative effect of doxepin and amitriptyline on cortical evoked potentials.. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1980;14(2):115‐9. - PubMed
Garry 1963 {published data only}
    1. Garry J, Leonard TJ. Trial of amitriptyline in chronic depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 1963;109:54‐5. - PubMed
Gomez 1968 {published data only}
    1. Gomez JR, Gomez G. The treatment of anxiety and depression in general‐practice using an amitriptyline‐perphenazine preparation. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1968;22(3):105‐9. - PubMed
Guy 1982 {published data only}
    1. Guy W, Ban TA, McEvoy JP, Petrie WM, Wilson WH, Schaffer JD. A collaborative study of a new antidepressant, viloxazine, in neurotic and endogenous depressives. International Pharmacopsychiatry 1982;17(1):36‐42. - PubMed
Hazell 1995 {published data only}
    1. Hazell P, O'Connell D, Heathcote D, Robertson J, Henry D. Efficacy of tricyclic drugs in treating child and adolescent depression: a meta‐analysis. BMJ 1995;310(6984):897‐901. - PMC - PubMed
Hecht 1986 {published data only}
    1. Hecht Orzack M, Cole JO, Friedman L, Bird M, McEachern J. Weight changes in antidepressants: a comparison of amitriptyline and trazodone. Neuropsychobiology 1986;15(Suppl 1):28‐30. - PubMed
Hollister 1964 {published data only}
    1. Hollister LE, Overall JE, Johnson M, Pennington V, Katz G, Shelton J. Controlled comparison of imipramine, amitriptyline and placebo in hospitalised depressed patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1964;139(4):370‐5. - PubMed
Houston 1983 {published data only}
    1. Houston J, Berg I, Butler A, McGuire R. Amitriptyline for depressed women with young children in general practice. British Journal of Psychiatry 1983;142:103‐4. - PubMed
Hussain 1970 {published data only}
    1. Hussain Z. Drugs in depressive illness. British Medical Journal 1970;1(707):482. - PMC - PubMed
Imlah 1985 {published data only}
    1. Imlah NW. An evaluation of alprazolam in the treatment of reactive or neurotic (secondary) depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 1985;146:515‐9. - PubMed
Itil 1972 {published data only}
    1. Itil TM, Cora R, Hsu W, Gig E, Saletu B. Clinical, toxicological and electroencephalographical effects of a new tricyclic antidepressant, OI‐77. Arzneimittelforschung 1972;22(12):2063‐6. - PubMed
Jacobson 1978 {published data only}
    1. Jacobson AF. Doctor‐patient concordance in a placebo‐controlled trial of limbitrol versus its components. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1978;14(3):61‐3. - PubMed
Kasper 1995 {published data only}
    1. Kasper S. Clinical efficacy of mirtazapine: a review. 8th European College of Neuropsychopharmacology Congress, Venice, Italy. 30th September ‐ 4th October. 1995.
Kasper 1997 {published data only}
    1. Kasper S. Mirtazapine vs amitriptyline and placebo in the treatment of severely depressed patients. 10th European College of Neuropsychopharmacology Congress, Vienna, Austria. 13th ‐ 17th September. 1997. - PubMed
Kasper 1997a {published data only}
    1. Kasper S. Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of severe depression: the place of mirtazapine. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 1997;17(Suppl 1):19S‐28S. - PubMed
Kiev 1974 {published data only}
    1. Kiev A. The role of chemotherapy in managing potentially suicidal patients. Diseases of the Nervous System 1974;35(3):108‐11. - PubMed
Klerman 1974 {published data only}
    1. Klerman GL, Dimascio A, Weissman M, Prusoff B, Paykel ES. Treatment of depression by drugs and psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry 1974;131(2):186‐91. - PubMed
Laakmann 1995 {published data only}
    1. Laakmann G, Faltermaier‐Temizel M, Bossert‐Zaudig S, Baghai T, Lorkowski G. Treatment of depressive outpatients with lorazepam, alprazolam, amitriptyline and placebo. Psychopharmacology 1995;120(1):109‐15. - PubMed
    1. Laakmann G, Faltermaier‐Temizel M, Bossert‐Zaudig S, Baghai T, Lorkowski G. Treatment of mild to moderate depressive syndrome. A placebo‐controlled double‐blind trial on therapy with benzodiazepines or antidepressants. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1996; Vol. 138, issue 5:39‐44.
Lipsedge 1970 {published data only}
    1. Lipsedge MS, Rees WL, Pike DJ. A double‐blind comparison of dothiepin and amitriptyline for the treatment of depression with anxiety. Psychopharmacologica 1971;19:153‐62. - PubMed
Malitz 1971 {published data only}
    1. Malitz S, Kanzler M. Are antidepressants better than placebo?. American Journal of Psychiatry 1971;127(12):1605‐11. - PubMed
Master 1963 {published data only}
    1. Master RS. Amitriptyline in depressive states. A controlled trial in India. British Journal of Psychiatry 1963;109:826‐9. - PubMed
McCallum 1975 {published data only}
    1. McCallum P, Meares R. A controlled trial of maprotiline (Ludiomil) in depressed outpatients. Medical Journal of Australia 1975;2(10):392‐3. - PubMed
McDonald 1966 {published data only}
    1. McDonald IM, Perkins M, Marjerrison G, Podilsky M. A controlled comparison of amitriptyline and electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 1966;122(12):1427‐31. - PubMed
McLean 1992 {published data only}
    1. McLean P, Taylor S. Severity of unipolar depression and choice of treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1992;30(5):443‐51. - PubMed
Moll 1990 {published data only}
    1. Moll E, Hetzel W. Moclobemide (Ro 11‐1163) safety in depressed patients. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica. Supplement 1990;82(360):69‐70. [CN‐00187843] - PubMed
Möller 1993 {published data only}
    1. Möller HJ, Berzewski H, Eckmann F, Gonzalves N, Kissling W, Knorr W, et al. Double‐blind multicenter study of paroxetine and amitriptyline in depressed inpatients. Pharmacopsychiatry 1993;26:75‐8. - PubMed
Montgomery 1980b {published data only}
    1. Montgomery SA, McAuley R, Montgomery DB. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of maprotiline and amitriptyline in endogenous depression: a double‐blind controlled trial. Clinical Therapy 1980;3(4):292‐310. - PubMed
Montgomery 1998 {published data only}
    1. Montgomery SA, Reimitz PE, Zivkov M. Mirtazapine versus amitriptyline in the long‐term treatment of depression: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 1998;13(2):63‐73. - PubMed
Morakinyo 1970 {published data only}
    1. Morakinyo VO. Amytriptyline and chlordiazepoxide (Limbitrol) in depressive states in Nigerians ‐ a double‐blind study. African Journal of Medical Sciences 1970;1(4):409‐14. - PubMed
Othmer 1983 {published data only}
    1. Othmer E, Othmer SC, Stern WC, Wyck Fleet J. Long‐term efficacy and safety of bupropion. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1983;44(5):153‐6. - PubMed
Othmer 1988 {published data only}
    1. Othmer SC, Thmer E, Preskorn SH, Mac D. Differential effect of amitriptyline and bupropion on primary and secondary depression: a pilot study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1988;49(8):310‐2. - PubMed
Paykel 1973c {published data only}
    1. Paykel ES, Prusoff BA, Klerman GL, Haskell D, DiMascio A. Clinical response to amitriptyline among depressed women. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1973;156(3):149‐65. [CN‐00008451] - PubMed
Podobnikar 1966 {published data only}
    1. Podobnikar IG. Treatment of mixed states of anxiety and depression. Diseases of the Nervous System 1966;27(12):811‐3. - PubMed
Prusoff 1974 {published data only}
    1. Prusoff B. Drug treatment of depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1974;10:59‐60.
Rampello 1995 {published data only}
    1. Rampello L, Nicoletti G, Raffaele R, Drago F. Comparative effects of amitriptyline and amineptine in patients affected by anxious depression. Neuropsychobiology 1995;31(3):130‐4. - PubMed
Rickels 1970 {published data only}
    1. Rickels K, Gordon PE, Jenkins BW, Perloff M, Sachs T, Stepansky W. Drug treatment in depressive illness. Diseases of the Nervous System 1970;31:30‐42. - PubMed
Rickels 1970b {published data only}
    1. Rickels K, Hesbacher P, Downing RW. Differential drug effects in neurotic depression. Diseases of the Nervous System 1970;31(7):468‐75. - PubMed
Rickels 1974 {published data only}
    1. Rickels K, Csanalosi I, Chung HR, Case WG, Pereira‐Ogan A, Downing RW. Amitriptyline in anxious‐depressed outpatients: a controlled study. American Journal of Psychiatry 1974;131(1):25‐30. - PubMed
Rickels 1981 {published data only}
    1. Rickels K. Limbitrol (amitriptyline plus chlordiazepoxide) revisited. Psychopharmacology 1981;75(1):31‐3. - PubMed
Rockliff 1971 {published data only}
    1. Rockliff BW. Measurement of drug effects in newly hospitalized depressives. Diseases of the Nervous System 1971;32(8):532‐7. - PubMed
Rosenberg 1974 {published data only}
    1. Rosenberg L. [Doppelblindprüfung von drei Antidepressiva]. Arzneimittel Forschung (Drug Research) 1974;24(2):207‐13. - PubMed
Schou 1979 {published data only}
    1. Schou M. Lithium as a prophylactic agent in unipolar affective illness: comparison with cyclic antidepressants. Archives of General Psychiatry 1979;36:849‐51. - PubMed
Skarbek 1962 {published data only}
    1. Skarbek A, Smedberg D. Amitriptyline: a controlled trial in chronic depressive states. British Journal of Psychiatry 1962;108:859‐61. - PubMed
Skarbek 1963 {published data only}
    1. Skarbek A. Trial of amitriptyline in chronic depression. Diseases of the Nervous System 1963;24(2):115‐9. [0012‐3714] - PubMed
Spiker 1988 {published data only}
    1. Spiker DG, Kupfer DJ. Placebo response rates in psychotic and nonpsychotic depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 1988;14(1):21‐3. - PubMed
Stabl 1989 {published data only}
    1. Stabl M, Biziere K, Schmid‐Burgk W, Amrein R. Review of comparative clinical trials. Moclobemide vs tricyclic antidepressants and vs placebo in depressive states. Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementum 1989;28:77‐89. - PubMed
Stahl 1997 {published data only}
    1. Stahl SM, Wingard P. Meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled studies of mirtazapine vs amitriptyline. Sixth World Congress of Biological Psychiatry, Nice, France. June 22‐27. 1997.
Stein 1980 {published data only}
    1. Stein MK, Rickels K, Weise CC. Maintenance therapy with amitriptyline: a controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980;137(3):370‐1. - PubMed
Taverna 1969 {published data only}
    1. Taverna P, Ferrari G. Comparative evaluation of nortriptyline, amitriptyline and of a placebo in the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders. Minerva Medica 1969;60(49):2417‐31. - PubMed
Taylor 1993 {published data only}
    1. Taylor S, McLean P. Outcome profiles in the treatment of unipolar depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1993;31(3):325‐30. - PubMed
Wallerstein 1967 {published data only}
    1. Wallerstein E, Dykyj R, Nodine JH. Fluphenazine and amitriptyline in the anxious depressed patient. American Journal of Psychiatry 1967;124(3):397‐8. - PubMed
Warner 1988 {published data only}
    1. Warner MD, Peabody CA, Whiteford HA, Hollister LE. Alprazolam as an antidepressant. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1988;49(4):148‐50. - PubMed
Welner 1980 {published data only}
    1. Welner A, Welner Z, Robins E. Effect of tricyclic antidepressants on individual symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1980;41(9):306‐9. [CN‐00023343] - PubMed
Wilson 1982 {published data only}
    1. Wilson PH. Combined pharmacological and behavioural treatment of depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1982;20(2):173‐84. - PubMed
Zis 1980 {published data only}
    1. Zis AP, Grof P, Webster MA, Goodwin FK. Prediction of relapse in recurrent affective disorder. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1980;16:47‐9. - PubMed
Zivkov 1995 {published data only}
    1. Zivkov M, De JGD. Org 3770 versus amitriptyline: a 6‐week randomized double‐blind multicentre trial in hospitalized depressed patients. Human Psychopharmacology 1995;10(3):173‐80.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Kahn 2008 {published data only}
    1. Kahn AY, Catterson ML, Preskorn SH. Double‐blind cross‐over study of mirtazapine, amitriptyline and placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. Directions in Psychiatry 2008;28:15‐20.

Additional references

Altman 1996
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ 1996;313:1200. - PMC - PubMed
APA 1980
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM III). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.
APA 1987
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition ‐ Revised (DSM‐III‐R). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
APA 1994
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM‐IV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
Barbui 2000
    1. Barbui C, Hotopf M, Freemantle M, Boynton J, Churchill R, Eccles MP. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants: comparison of drug adherence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791] - DOI - PubMed
Barbui 2008
    1. Barbui C, Furukawav TA, Cipriani A. Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of acute major depression in adults: a systematic re‐examination of published and unpublished data from randomized trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2008;178:296‐305. - PMC - PubMed
Berger 2004
    1. Berger M. Psychische Erkrankungen. Klinik und Therapie. 2. München: Urban & Fischer, 2004.
Brozek 2008
    1. Brozek J, Oxman AD, Schünemann H. GRADEpro. Version 3.2 for Windows. http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/gradepro 2008.
Cipriani 2009
    1. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Geddes JR, Higgins JP, Churchill R, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new‐generation antidepressants: a multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis. Lancet 2009;373:746‐58. - PubMed
Cuijpers 2010
    1. Cuijpers K, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, Hollen SE, Andersson G. Efficacy of cognitive‐behaviour therapy and other psychological therapies for adult depression: meta‐analytic study of publication bias. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010;196:173‐8. - PubMed
Davis 1993
    1. Davis JM, Wang Z, Janicak PG. A quantitative analysis of clinical drug trials for the treatment of affective disorders. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 1993;29:175‐81. - PubMed
Der‐Simonian 1986
    1. Der‐Simonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177‐88. - PubMed
Duval 2000
    1. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot‐based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455‐63. - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey‐Smith G, Schneider M, Minder CSO. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;13:629‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Elbourne 2002
    1. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:140‐9. - PubMed
Feighner 1972
    1. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Winokur G, Munoz R. Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry 1972;26:57‐63. - PubMed
Furukawa 2003
    1. Furukawa TA, McGuire H, Barbui C. Low dosage tricyclic antidepressants for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003197] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Furukawa 2006
    1. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N. Imputing missing standard deviations in meta‐analysis can provide accurate results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006;59:7‐10. - PubMed
Gayetot 2007
    1. Gayetot D, Ansseau M, Triffaux JM. When depression does not end. Resistant depression: recent clinical and therapeutic aspects. Review Medical de Liege 2007;62(2):103‐11. - PubMed
Gloaguen 1998
    1. Gloaguen V, Cottraux J, Cucherata M, Blackburn J. A meta‐analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders 1998;49:59‐71. - PubMed
GPRD 2011
    1. Personal communication. GPRD. http://www.gprd.com/ 2011.
Greenberg 1992
    1. Greenberg RP, Bornstein RF, Greenberg MD, Fisher S. A meta‐analysis of antidepressant outcome under "blinder" conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1992;60:664‐9. - PubMed
Guaiana 2007
    1. Guaiana G, Barbui C, Hotopf M. Amitriptyline versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004186.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Guy 1976
    1. Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions ‐ ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology (DHEW Publ No ADM 76‐338). Revised. Rockville MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH, 1976.
Hamilton 1960
    1. Hamilton M. A rating scale of depression. Journal of Neurology 1960;23:56‐62. - PMC - PubMed
Henry 1995
    1. Henry JA, Alexander CA, Sener EK. Relative mortality from overdose of antidepressants. British Medical Journal 1995 Jan 28;310((6974)):221‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org 2008.
Kawakami 2007
    1. Kawakami N. Epidemiology of depressive disorders in Japan and the world. Nippon Rinsho 2007;65(9):1578‐84. - PubMed
Kirsch 2008
    1. Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo‐Medina TB, Scoboria A, Moore TJ, Johnson BT. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta‐analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PloS Medicine 2008;5:e45. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Leucht 2007
    1. Leucht S, Davis JM, Engel RR, Kane JM, Kissling W, Engel RR. Defining 'response' in antipsychotic drug trials: recommendations for the use of scale‐derived cutoffs. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007;32:1903‐10. - PubMed
Leucht 2012
    1. Leucht S, Hierl S, Kissling W, Dold M, Davis JM. Putting the efficacy of psychiatric and general medicine medication into perspective: review of meta‐analyses. British Journal of Psychiatry 2012;200(2):97‐106. - PubMed
Lohse 2009
    1. Lohse MJ, Müller‐Oerlinghausen B. Psychopharmaka. In: Schwabe U, Pfaffrath D editor(s). Arzneiverordnungsreport 2009. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009:820‐64.
Luborsky 1962
    1. Luborsky L. Clinician's judgments of mental health. Archives of General Psychiatry 1962;7:407‐17. - PubMed
McAllister‐Williams 2008
    1. McAllister‐Williams RH. Do antidepressants work? A commentary on “Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta‐analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration” by Kirsch et al. Evid Based Mental Health 2008;11(3):66‐8. [DOI: 10.1136/ebmh.11.3.66] - DOI - PubMed
Moher 2001
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel‐group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987‐91. - PubMed
Moncrieff 2004
    1. Moncrieff J, Wessely S, Hardy R. Active placebos versus antidepressants for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003012.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Montgomery 1979
    1. Montgomery SA, Åsberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry 1979;134:382‐9. - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408‐12. - PubMed
Spitzer 1978
    1. Spitzer RL, Robins E. Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry 1978;35:773‐82. - PubMed
Storosum 2001
    1. Storosum JG, Elferink AJ, Zwieten BJ, Brink W, Gersons BP, vanStrik R, et al. Short‐term efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants revisited: a meta‐analytic study. European Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;11:173‐80. - PubMed
Trikalinos 2004
    1. Trikalinos TA, Churchill R, Ferri M, Leucht S, Tuunainen A, Wahlbeck K, et al. EU‐PSI project. Effect sizes in cumulative meta‐analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004;57:1124‐30. - PubMed
Turner 2008
    1. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;358:252‐60. - PubMed
Walsh 2002
    1. Walsh BT, Seidman SN, Sysko R, Gould M. Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing. JAMA 2002;287:1840‐7. - PubMed
Ware 1993
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF‐36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre, 1993.
WHO 1978
    1. World Health Organization. The Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD‐9). Geneva: World Health Organization, 1978.
WHO 1992
    1. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD‐10). Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.
WHO 2005
    1. World Health Organization. The European Health Report 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
Wing 1994
    1. Wing J. Measuring Mental Health Outcomes: a Perspective from the Royal College of Psychiatrists. London: BMJ Publishing, 1994.
Zimmerman 2004
    1. Zimmerman M, Posternak MA, Chelminski I. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery‐Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression. Journal of Psychiatry Research 2004;38:577‐82. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources