The concept of major depression. I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R
- PMID: 1829000
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02189537
The concept of major depression. I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R
Abstract
All operationalized diagnostic systems contain a diagnostic category, which corresponds to the concept of major depression. Yet, these corresponding definitions are not identical. Up to now, no comprehensive comparisons of the competing diagnoses have been published. We will therefore present a series of studies, describing six different operational definitions of major depression according to their content and construction and empirically comparing them in large inpatient and outpatient samples. This first paper presents a descriptive comparison of the definitions given in the Feighner Diagnostic Criteria, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition and third edition, revised, and in two developmental drafts of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research (draft April 1987-I87; draft April 1989-I89). The descriptive comparison will demonstrate that there are many similarities, especially concerning the symptom-criteria of major depression. Classificatory relevance could only be assumed for those differences found for cut-offs, for time criteria and especially for exclusion criteria. Whether these differences are negligible and whether patients classified by different diagnostic systems are really comparable will be examined in subsequent publications.
Similar articles
-
The concept of major depression. II. Agreement between six competing operational definitions in 600 psychiatric inpatients.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):266-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02189538. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991. PMID: 1829001
-
The concept of major depression. III. Concurrent validity of six competing operational definitions for the clinical ICD-9 diagnosis.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):272-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02189539. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991. PMID: 1829002
-
Neuraesthenia revisited: ICD-10 and DSM-III-R psychiatric syndromes in chronic fatigue patients and comparison subjects.Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;167(4):503-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.4.503. Br J Psychiatry. 1995. PMID: 8829720
-
[The difference between depression and melancholia: two distinct conditions that were combined into a single category in DSM-III].Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2012;114(8):886-905. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2012. PMID: 23012851 Review. Japanese.
-
[Importance of DSM IV (APA) and ICD-10 (WHO) in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders].Encephale. 1995 Dec;21 Spec No 5:47-52. Encephale. 1995. PMID: 8582307 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Is low cognitive functioning a predictor or consequence of major depressive disorder? A test in two longitudinal birth cohorts.Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Nov 16:1-15. doi: 10.1017/S095457941700164X. Online ahead of print. Dev Psychopathol. 2017. PMID: 29144220 Free PMC article.
-
The concept of major depression. II. Agreement between six competing operational definitions in 600 psychiatric inpatients.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):266-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02189538. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991. PMID: 1829001
-
Differentiation between major and minor depression.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;106 Suppl:S75-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02246241. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992. PMID: 1546147 Review.
-
The concept of major depression. III. Concurrent validity of six competing operational definitions for the clinical ICD-9 diagnosis.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(4-5):272-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02189539. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991. PMID: 1829002
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous