Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991;240(4-5):258-65.
doi: 10.1007/BF02189537.

The concept of major depression. I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R

Affiliations
Review

The concept of major depression. I. Descriptive comparison of six competing operational definitions including ICD-10 and DSM-III-R

M Philipp et al. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991.

Abstract

All operationalized diagnostic systems contain a diagnostic category, which corresponds to the concept of major depression. Yet, these corresponding definitions are not identical. Up to now, no comprehensive comparisons of the competing diagnoses have been published. We will therefore present a series of studies, describing six different operational definitions of major depression according to their content and construction and empirically comparing them in large inpatient and outpatient samples. This first paper presents a descriptive comparison of the definitions given in the Feighner Diagnostic Criteria, the Research Diagnostic Criteria, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition and third edition, revised, and in two developmental drafts of the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for research (draft April 1987-I87; draft April 1989-I89). The descriptive comparison will demonstrate that there are many similarities, especially concerning the symptom-criteria of major depression. Classificatory relevance could only be assumed for those differences found for cut-offs, for time criteria and especially for exclusion criteria. Whether these differences are negligible and whether patients classified by different diagnostic systems are really comparable will be examined in subsequent publications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;35(6):773-82 - PubMed
    1. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1981;290:29-41 - PubMed
    1. Psychopathology. 1985;18(4):218-25 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972 Jan;26(1):57-63 - PubMed
    1. J Psychiatr Res. 1986;20(4):289-99 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources