Talk:Multo (song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multo (song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Tambayan Philippines: Music Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Philippine music task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Multo (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2025	Good article nominee	Listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that "Multo" was the first song by a Filipino act to enter the Billboard Global 200 chart?

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Royiswariii talk 08:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that "Multo" became the first song by a Filipino act to enter the

Billboard Global 200 chart?

Source: https://billboardphilippines.com/market/chart-beat/cup-of-joe-are-the-first-filipino-act-to-break-into-the-billboard-global-200/

ALT1: ... that "Multo" became the highest debut and the first entry of a Filipino song on the top 100 of the Billboard Global Excl. U.S. chart, placing at number 74? Source: https://billboardphilippines.com/market/chart-beat/cup-of-joe-are-the-first-filipino-act-to-break-into-the-billboard-global-200/
Reviewed:
Comment: I'm double thinking if I should put the position of the song on Billboard Global 200 chart in the first hook too.

Created by AstrooKai (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

AstrooKai (Talk) 22:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Looking at this, this is good. This is cited adequately and I don't see anything that contradicts it (unless I missed something). Ominae (talk) 06:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]