User talk:FuzzyMagma

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is FuzzyMagma's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your GA nomination of Godwin Obasi

The article Godwin Obasi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Godwin Obasi and Talk:Godwin Obasi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 19:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Godwin Obasi

The article Godwin Obasi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Godwin Obasi for comments about the article, and Talk:Godwin Obasi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vigilantcosmicpenguin thanks for taking the time. Now the big reveal: I was about to start reviewing Abortion in Malawi just before you started reviewing mine but I thought it will look bad (like a quid pro quo). I will give it a month for the dust to settle down, before reviewing on of the abortion in Africa articles. Thank you for working on them. See you around FuzzyMagma (talk) 06:53, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Hello thank you for thanking me for my edits I also thanked you!! I recently been following sudan's civil war non stop and before syrias but i didnt edit anything. I decided to now start editing because I'm feeling better mentally and yeah. <33 PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Hey have also this award its the first time im sending awards here :)) PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Yooo I didnt know I can send so much awards lmao but lets gooo!!! Btw in my school I signed for Africa Olympiad and I got to the second second stage, the questions were mainly historical and maps but also political so yeah. also you deserve all these awards brooo PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lol many thanks and hope to see more of your work around Sudan. Take care and please ping me if you think I can help FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan Countryball for yuo huehue

	Sudancountryballexe
	Countryballs rule PersonFromPoland (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Supporter of Sudan

	Sudan Wiki Commando
	For constant updates on Sudan PersonFromPoland (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of edits on Sudanese civil war (2023–present)

Please explain your reversion (with twinkle and a canned summary) of my sourced edits that clarify the position given by Amnesty International. 142.157.211.245 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Yemen and UAE part is already included in UAE section. for the embargo you did not provide a source. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and also is not supported by the sourced that you (re) used. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is supported by this quote: The UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo on non-governmental entities in Darfur in 2004, to which the PRC is a member of. Warmly,142.157.211.245 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is 2023, not 2004 FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

from where did you get the quote? FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Arab supremacy has been nominated for deletion

Category:Arab supremacy has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Discussion about Oyster Bay, Tanzania

Hi, I recently started this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyster Bay, Tanzania AfD discussion about Oyster Bay, Tanzania. Given that there are no RS for this beach area of tourist shops and food stalls, I think this is clearly not notable. - Thanks for having a look and adding your judgement on the AfD discussion. Munfarid1 (talk) 08:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw the nom couple of days ago and my thoughts was this is Keep per WP:GEOLAND, which has a very broad definition for notability. I didn’t vote and left it to the community but in my opinion it’s a keep. FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ash Shajarah

Hello FuzzyMagma,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ash Shajarah for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Pichpich (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pichpich was a redirect? becuase this the actual article Al-Shajara, Khartoum or maybe this Al-Shajara. Can you explain why yo have deleted the redirect. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FuzzyMagma. My mistake, sorry. In my defense, the deleting admin made the same mistake, but I should own up. Some editor replaced your redirect by a stub about a non-notable website, which I tagged for speedy deletion because I did not check the article's history. Had I checked, I would simply have reverted to your original redirect. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 21:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly I suspected something like that happened. I saw some editors being cheeky and starting articles on stubs to avoid the draft process, so thanks for keeping an eye out. FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RSF atrocities in Khartoum

Hi. Thank you for creating an article about the RSF atrocities in Khartoum, but I unfortunately have to point out three main issues:

The named reference Battle of Khartoum (2023–2025) SkyRetakes was invoked 4 times but never defined, please fix that;
The merger of pre-existing articles into new ones without previous {{merge}} notice (as you did with 2025 Omdurman market attack) is actually deprecated, especially when you're the user who created the new article. Looks like you also left some infos out. The merger is going to be reverted;
atrocities is a morally-charged term, be careful with it; as far as I know, we only have two articles all over the wiki using that term (Atrocities in the Congo Free State, Soviet atrocities committed against prisoners of war during World War II, plus the disambiguation page Atrocities committed during the Spanish Civil War), and all of them strictly regard widely recognized war crimes and human rights violations that were studied and confirmed by independent organizations.

Greetings – Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 16:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback

that happens when you use excerpts
Can you support your argument about the merge using existing policies. I couldn’t find any update
I disagree on the third, as using “war crime” or “crime against humanity“ requires the actions to fit the legal definition. Similar to genocide. Having said that, let me know if you have a better title.

FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Est. 2021 in case you want to respond (you do not have to but in case) FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, thanks for tagging me. I'm glad you fixed the references. By the way, your merger completely left out the fact that the RSF denied any involvement and accused the SAF, having the UN recognize that Markets have frequently come under attack by both parties since the conflict began in April 2023, an important fact you just distorted again writing that RSF shelled the Sabreen Market while knowing it could have been the SAF, as they already did multiple times. Quoting the UN, for example: On 9 December, it is reported that airstrikes by the Sudanese Armed Forces on a market in Kabkabiya town in North Darfur killed at least 42 civilians and injured many others. I assume you did these mistakes in good faith, but please acknowledge that insisting on one party's version would be a violation of WP:NPOV. Please, avoid that. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kabkabiya is far away from Khartoum, and it is within the area controlled by RSF. Shelling and air strikes are quite different. How is that your source?!

If you read the sources about the attack it states that it is the RSF, and both sides of the war denies these kind of massacres so it is meangliness to say they denied, becuase of course they will. It is WP:NPOV when you are giving RSF denial a wieght (a complete paragraph) when all the reports are saying something different.

And you did not respond to any of my points above, you actually just added more and accused me of something that is no way a WP:NPOV FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so willing to omit that Markets have frequently come under attack by both parties since the conflict began in April 2023? The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights surely knows better. All your reports come from the Sudan Armed Forces, which is one of the two accused parties. That's definitely a POV. Please, refrain from such attitude and fix those paragraphs yourself, otherwise other measures could be taken. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that was editing conflict, and now I am adding more percise source rather than a generic statement that is not about Khartoum.

I did not know that France 24 belongs to the SAF FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banters are not going to help. While it does not belong to the SAF, it certainly relies on their reports alone. There was no independent reporter nor investigation by France 24, as their articles clearly acknowledge. The UN and Amnesty both recognized that massacres and other crimes are clearly getting perpetrated by both warring parties. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 19:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

are you now doing WP:OR? FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

for the general war crimes, go to War crimes during the Sudanese civil war (2023–present), for RSF in Khartoum you know where to go. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#From content dispute to vandalism regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hussein Kamel Bahaeddin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hussein Kamel Bahaeddin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 07:42, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]