Skip to main content
Log in

“Euthanasia”: a confusing term, abused under the Nazi regime and misused in present end-of-life debate

  • Review
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Legal provisions in The Netherlands and Belgium currently allow physicians to actively end a patient's life at his or her request under certain conditions. The term that is used for this is “euthanasia.”

Discussion

The same term, “euthanasia,” was used in Germany during the Nazi regime for a program of cleansing the “German nation” in which untold thousands of persons were denied human empathy or medical care and were thereby condemned to death. The medical profession played a leading role in the planning, administration, and supervision of this “euthanasia” program, with a large proportion of German physicians proactively shirking all moral responsibility and ultimately paving the way for the Holocaust.

Conclusion

The term “euthanasia” was so abused during the Nazi regime as a camouflage word for murder of selected subpopulations with the willing participation of physicians, we believe that, regardless of the benevolent goals of current euthanasia practices, for historical reasons the term “euthanasia” must not be used with regards to current end-of-life care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woddcock T, Ethicus Study Group (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units. JAMA 290:790–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, Nilstun T, Norup M, Paci E, van der Wal G, van der Maas PJ, EURELD Consortium (2003) End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 362:345–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, Hinds C, Pimentel JM, Reinhart K, Thompson BT (2004) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 30:770–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michalsen A, Reinhart K (2004) Die Versorgung Sterbender auf Intensivstationen. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 45:738–740

    Google Scholar 

  5. Draper R (1998) Encyclopaedia of applied ethics. London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD (2001) Managing death in the intensive care unit. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eerste Kamer der Staten Generaal (2001) Wet toetsing levensbeëindiging op verzoek en hulp bij zelfdoding. Vergaderjaar 2000–2001, 26691, no 137

  8. Ministerie van Justitie (2002) Wet betreffende de euthanasie. Brussels, 28 May

  9. van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I, de Graaff Cl, Kester JG, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A, Bosma JM, Willems DL (1996) Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. N Engl J Med 335:1699–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Legemaate J (2002) Vergelijkbaar maar niet hetzelfde-wetgeving voor euthanasie in Nederland en België. Med Contact 57:1855–1858

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kater L (2003) The Dutch model for legalising end-of-life decisions. Med Law 22:543–550

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A, Koper D, Keij-Deerenberg I, Rietjens JA, Rurup ML, Vrakking AM, Georges JJ, Muller MT, van der Wal G, van der Maas PJ (2003) Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands in 1990, 1995, and 2001. Lancet 362:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Wal G, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Maas PJ (2003) Medische besluitvorming aan het einde van het leven: de praktijk en de toetsingsprocedure euthanasie. Uitgeverij de Tijdstroom, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  14. Delden JJM van (2004) The unfeasibility of requests for euthanasia in advance directives. J Med Ethics 30:447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinbock B (2005) The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven. J Med Ethics 31:224–235

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rurup ML, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Jansen-van der Weide MC, van der Wal G (2005) When being ‘tired of life’ plays an important role in a request for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: patient characteristics and the physician's decision. Health Policy 74:157–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jansen-van der Weide MC, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Wal G (2005) Granted, undecided, withdrawn, and refused requests for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 165:1698–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Benzenhöfer U (1999) Der gute Tod? Euthanasie und Sterbehilfe in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Beck'sche Reihe, München

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen S, Sprung C, Sjokvist P, Lippert A, Ricou B, Baras M, Hovilehto S, Maia P, Phelan D, Reinhart K, Werdan K, Bulow HH, Woodcock T (2005) Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 31:1215–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Proctor RN (1992) Nazi doctors, racial medicine and human experimentation. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burleigh M (1994) Death and deliverance. Euthanasia in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barondess JA (1996) Medicine against society-lessons form the Third Reich. JAMA 276:1657–1661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Labisch A (2001) Die “hygienische Revolution” im medizinischen Denken. In: Ebbinghaus A, Dörner K (eds) Vernichten und Heilen. Der Nürnberger Ärzteprozess und seine Folgen. Aufbau-Verlag, Berlin, pp 68–89

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geiderman JM (2002) Ethics seminars: physician complicity in the Holocaust: historical review and reflections on the emergency medicine in the 21st century, I. Acad Emerg Med 9:223–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bacharach S (2004) In the name of public health-Nazi racial hygiene. N Engl J Med 351:417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Echternkamp J (2004) Im Kampf an der inneren und äußeren Front. Grundzüge der deutschen Gesellschaft im Zweiten Weltkrieg. In: Echternkamp J (ed) Die Deutsche Kriegsgesellschaft 1939 bis 1945 (erster Halbband). Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, München, pp 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  27. Binding K, Hoche A (1920) Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens. Meiner, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  28. Burleigh M (1994) Psychiatry, German society, and the Nazi ‘euthanasia’ programme. Soc Hist Med 1994 7:213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanauske-Abel HM (1996) Not a slippery slope or sudden subversion: German medicine and national socialism in 1933. BMJ 313:1453–1463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Blasius D (1998) Psychiatrie im Nationalsozialismus. In: Kolb S, Seithe H, IPPNW (eds) Medizin und Gewissen. Mabuse-Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 72–85

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kater MH (2001) Die soziale Lage der Ärzte im NS-Staat. In: Ebbinghaus A, Dörner K (eds) Vernichten und Heilen. Der Nürnberger Ärzteprozess und seine Folgen. Aufbau-Verlag, Berlin, pp 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wiesing U (ed) Ethik in der Medizin, 2nd edn. Reclam, Stuttgart, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  33. Toellner R (2002) Wissen kann Gewissen nicht ersetzen—das Versagen der Ärzte im Dritten Reich und die Folgen bis heute. In: Härlin J, Klein K, Kolb S et al. (eds) Medizin und Gewissen—wenn Würde ein Wert würde. Mabuse-Verlag, Frankfurt, pp 26–41

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mitscherlich A, Mielke F (1949) Wissenschaft ohne Menschlichkeit. Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pross C (1992) Nazi doctors, German medicine, and historical truth. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 32–52

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bleker J, Jachertz N (eds) (1993) Medizin im “Dritten Reich,” 2nd edn. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A. Karenberg, MD, PhD, Cologne, and R. Hoff, MD, Utrecht, reviewed early versions of the manuscript; their help is gratefully acknowledged. This article is based on the presentation “Euthanasia—History and Definition” by A. Michalsen, given at the 18th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam, September, 2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Michalsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalsen, A., Reinhart, K. “Euthanasia”: a confusing term, abused under the Nazi regime and misused in present end-of-life debate. Intensive Care Med 32, 1304–1310 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0256-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0256-9

Keywords